John Flowerdew and Tracey Costley (eds): Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into Practice

Jihua Dong,Feng (Kevin) Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy010
IF: 3.6
2018-01-01
Applied Linguistics
Abstract:University students need disciplinary literacy to align their disciplinary writing with the norms and ways that disciplines build arguments and construct knowledge (Hyland 2000; Nesi & Gardner 2012; Durrant 2017). Thus discipline-specific writing has grown as an important area of academic discourse studies in recent decades, but not enough research has been done on classroom instruction and material design of this important literacy practice. This lack of attention seems critical given the great demand by a growing enrollment in discipline-specific courses. The book under review is a timely reference, bringing together both theory and practice in disciplinary writing and explores various useful approaches to teaching discipline-specific writing courses. This volume is organized broadly following a curriculum cycle involved in preparing and delivering discipline-specific writing courses. Specifically, following the introductory chapter and a discussion of local context in Chapter 2, Chapters 3–6 spell out key concepts of discipline-specific writing, including course design, grammar, vocabulary, and genre. Then approaches to teaching specific disciplines and genres are discussed, such as laboratory reports for science and technology students (Chapter 7), literature review to students in social science (Chapter 8), business memo for business students (Chapter 9), and scientific writing for publication (Chapter 10). The last three Chapters 11–13 focus on the application of corpus approaches to disciplinary writing, such as data-driven learning (DDL), critical literacy, and writing assessment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?