Δ15n of Nitric Oxide Produced under Aerobic or Anaerobic Conditions from Seven Soils and Their Associated N Isotope Fractionations

Chenxia Su,Ronghua Kang,Weixing Zhu,Wentao Huang,Linlin Song,Ang Wang,Dongwei Liu,Zhi Quan,Feifei Zhu,Pingqing Fu,Yunting Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jg005705
2020-01-01
Abstract:Measuring the nitrogen isotope compositions (δ 15 N) of nitric oxide (NO) from different sources helps to quantify the relative contributions of atmospheric NO x . Soil is one of the most important sources of atmospheric NO x , but only limited measurements on the δ 15 N of soil‐emitted NO exist, hampering our ability to partition sources to air pollution. Here we conducted soil incubations to measure the δ 15 N‐NO under defined aerobic or anaerobic conditions, favoring either nitrification or denitrification. Soils were collected from seven sites spanning three ecosystems in northern China (two agricultural, two forest, and three grassland sites). We found that the δ 15 N‐NO and their associated N isotope fractionations were significantly different between anaerobic and aerobic conditions in seven soils. Under aerobic condition, the δ 15 N‐NO ranged from −62‰ to −50‰ (averaged −56 ± 4‰), being significantly more negative (by 23‰) than those under anaerobic condition (−45‰ to −23‰, averaged −33 ± 7‰). The apparent N isotope fractionation for NO production under aerobic condition ( 15 ε aerobic = 61 ± 3‰) was significantly higher (by 26‰) than under anaerobic condition ( 15 ε anaerobic = 35 ± 6‰), with a small variability among ecosystem types. Our study demonstrates that the δ 15 N‐NO from different soils are very different from fuel combustions (mainly from 0‰ to +20‰), supporting that measuring 15 N is a useful tool to partition the contributions of soil NO to atmospheric NO x . Our results also imply δ 15 N‐NO produced by nitrification and denitrification distinctly different, as these two processes are dominant processes producing NO under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?