Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to encourage scholars to look at commonly considered phenomena in international business and cross-cultural research in new ways and to theorize and explore how cultural diversity, distance, and foreignness create value for global organizations. These considerations should result in a more balanced treatment of culture in cross-cultural management (CCM) research. Design/methodology/approach The idea that there are negative consequences associated with cultural differences is pervasive in hypotheses formulation and empirical testing in international business and CCM literature, as reflected in widely used constructs such as “cultural distance,” “cultural misfit,” “foreignness,” and related concepts. Consistent with a Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS) perspective on culture and cultural differences, the authors emphasize the positive role of distance and diversity across national, cultural, institutional, and organizational dimensions. In addition, they provide an overview of the contributions to the special issue. Findings Examining the positive side of culture is not only beneficial theoretically in terms of filling the existing gaps in the literature, but is also crucial for the practice of international and global business. Accordingly, the contributions to the special issue highlight how explicitly considering positive phenomena can help better understand when and how cultural diversity, distance, and foreignness can enhance organizational effectiveness and performance at multiple levels. They include five research papers, a Distinguished Scholar Essay by Kim Cameron, the Founder of the POS movement, and an interview piece with Richard Nisbett, a Pioneer Researcher in culture and cognition. Originality/value The overemphasis on adverse outcomes associated with cultural differences in existing research has hindered the understanding of the processes and conditions that help organizations leverage the benefits of cultural differences in a wide range of contexts. This introductory paper together with the contributions included in the special issue showcases the positive dynamics and outcomes associated with cultural differences, distance, and diversity in a wide range of international business contexts.

A Conclusion, Yet an Opening to Enriching the Normative Approach of Culture

Reply to Commentaries on 'An Evolutionary Framework for Cultural Change: Selectionism versus Communal Exchange'

Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics

Confronting the Challenge of Cultural Studies: The Future of Comparative Literature

Many faces of the concept of culture (and education)

Use and misuse of the concept of culture

Measuring Cultures Through Intersubjective Cultural Norms

A cultural analysis is necessary in understanding intersubjectivity

Exploring Criticality in Chinese Philosophy: Refuting Generalisations and Supporting Critical Thinking

Seeking for the Definition of “Culture”: Current Concerns and their Implications. A Comment on Gustav Jahoda’s Article “Critical Reflections on some Recent Definitions of “Culture’”’

The upside of cultural differences: Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in cross-cultural management research

Considerations on “Culture, advanced Culture and University Culture”

New Opportunities for Cultural Awareness and Criticism: What Arnold, Leavis and Williams Matter to us

Linking Norms and Culture

On Chinese Culture

Expanding the discursive domain of research on the New Culture Movement: An incomplete review of studies on the New Culture Movement

China's Resources for Constructing the Contemporary Philosophy of Culture

Studying Chinese culture and conflict: a research agenda

Closing the Gap between Art and Life: Digital Art as Discursive Framework

Culture, Influence, and the “I-ness” of Me: Commentary on Papers by Susan Bodnar, Gary B. Walls, and Steven Botticelli

Cultural competence and cultural humility: A critical reflection on key cultural diversity concepts