The Meaning and Protection of the Child's Welfare: Ethical Identities and Ethical Choices in Ian McEwan's The Children Act

Shang Biwu

2015-01-01

Abstract:In the disguise of the conflicts between religion and law, Ian McEwan's The Children Act deceptively diverts critics' attention to religious and legal issues. In light of ethical literary criticism, this paper intends to explore an ethical tragedy embedded in the sub-text of the novel, in which characters' sympathies and emotions are suppressed by their seemingly unarguable bigotry and ration. Taking a close look at the various legal cases that Fiona Maye deals with, and the blood transfusion case of Adam Henry in particular, we are able to detect McEwan's implicit ethical concern: the understanding and judgments of a child's welfare. What most characters share in common is their serious lack of respect for life: Adam's parents stubbornly adhere to the religious doctrines while Fiona acts upon the dogmatic law. Admittedly, in the eyes of her peers and herself, Fiona is a righteous and dutiful lawyer, who always follows the provisions of The Children Act and regards a child's welfare as her "paramount consideration". Noteworthy is the fact that Adam's blood transfusion case and his consequential death haunt Fiona and drive her to a new recognition of a child's welfare: life is the most fundamental welfare of a child, and to protect a child's welfare is, first and foremost, to protect and sustain his life, and a judge's duty should not end in the walls of the court but be extended to the entire society.