Abstract:Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eye region during face recognition, whereas Easterners consistently focus more on the nose, yet recognition accuracy is comparable (Blais et al., 2008). However, the face literature has robustly shown that the critical information for face recognition is located in the eyes and partially the mouth, but not the nose. Moreover, since eye movements in natural viewing conditions do not provide unequivocal evidence on the measure of the visual information being used by observers, the question of whether humans universally use similar facial information to recognize faces remains unresolved. To address this issue, we monitored eye movements during face recognition of thirty Western Caucasian (WC) and thirty East Asian (EA) observers with a novel technique that parametrically restricts information outside central vision. We used ‘Spotlights’ with Gaussian apertures of 2°, 5° or 8° dynamically centered on observers' fixations. Face recognition performance improved with increasing Spotlight apertures. Regardless of culture, observers actively fixated the eyes and mouth with constrained Spotlights (2°, 5°). In the 8° condition, information from both eyes and mouth was simultaneously available when fixating the nose and, as expected, only EA observers shifted their fixations towards this region. This central location is optimal to integrate information globally, a cultural marker of Easterners' perceptual strategies. WC observers engage in analytic strategies and their facial feature-by-feature strategy was not affected by Spotlight apertures. Social experience and cultural factors shape the way humans think about the world and regulate the strategies used to extract information from faces. However, these external forces do not modulate the information used to solve this critical biological feat. Human beings rely on identical facial information to recognize conspecifics, a universal law dictated by the evolutionary constraints of nature and not nurture.

Show Your Teeth or Not: the Role of the Mouth and Eyes in Smiles and Its Cross-Cultural Variations

Eyes are windows to the Chinese soul: evidence from the detection of real and fake smiles

How Facial Cues of Models Affect Attention to Websites in Asian and American Cultures

Effects of Model Eye Gaze Direction on Consumer Visual Processing: Evidence from China and America

Does a Big Duchenne Smile Really Matter on E-Commerce Websites? an Eye-Tracking Study in China

Look into the mind or look at the eyes: A comparison of Chinese and westerner's beliefs of lies

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

Face Recognition Subserves Nature Not Nurture

Be Careful Where You Smile: Culture Shapes Judgments of Intelligence and Honesty of Smiling Individuals

Do Only Fools Smile at Strangers? Cultural Differences in Social Perception of Intelligence of Smiling Individuals

Beyond Smiles: Static Expressions in Maxillary Protrusion and Associated Positivity

Analysis of soft tissue display in Chinese subjects during an enjoyment smile.

Laypersons' perception of smile esthetics from different backgrounds

Leaders' smiles reflect cultural differences in ideal affect

Who Smiles While Alone? Rates of Smiling Lower in China Than US

Analysis of Dynamic Smile and Upper Lip Curvature in Young Chinese

Smile variation leaks personality and increases the accuracy of interpersonal judgments

Unattended Emotional Prosody Affects Visual Processing of Facial Expressions in Mandarin-Speaking Chinese: A Comparison With English-Speaking Canadians

Esthetics and Smile‐related Characteristics Assessed by Laypersons

Deep learning reveals what facial expressions mean to people in different cultures

Evidence for Distinct Facial Signals of Reward, Affiliation, and Dominance from Both Perception and Production Tasks