Results of the multicenter early feasibility study (EFS) of the Renata Minima stent as treatment for branch pulmonary artery stenosis and coarctation of aorta in infants

Darren P. Berman,Brian Morray,Patrick Sullivan,Shabana Shahanavaz,Evan M. Zahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31074
IF: 2.3
2024-05-14
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background Stent implantation has become standard of care in older children and adults for treatment of branch pulmonary artery stenosis (BPAS) and coarctation aorta (CoAo). There are no stents approved or available for infants that have the potential to be dilated to adult diameters. The Minima stent was designed to fulfill this unmet need. Methods Multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized early feasibility study evaluating safety and effectiveness of the Minima stent for treatment of BPAS and CoAo. Primary endpoints included: (1) successful deployment across lesion, (2) stenosis relief defined by an increase in angiographic diameter of >50% and (3) freedom from stent explant, embolization or migration at 30 days and 6 months. Results Between 2/2022 and 5/2022, 10 pts underwent Minima stent implantation with a median age and weight of 9 months (4–43 months) and 7.6 kg (5.1−16.9 kg). Procedural success and predefined stenosis relief was achieved in all cases (CoAo [n = 4], BPAS [n = 6]). Adverse events occurred in 3 pts: transient diminished lower extremity pulse (n = 2), distal stent on‐balloon displacement successfully managed in the catheterization suite (n = 1). There were no deaths or major adverse events. All patients were free from stent explant and migration at 30 days and 6 months with no evidence for significant restenosis at latest follow‐up. Conclusions Implantation of the Renata Minima stent was safe and effective for the treatment of BPAS and CoAo in this small cohort of infants and young children during early follow‐up. Based on these early results, an expanded study with longer follow‐up is warranted.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?