Older Dogs with Whole Body and Myocardial Insulin Resistance Develop an Accelerated Course of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Following Rapid Pacing

Pratik Parikh,Siva Bhashyam,Indu G. Poornima,Hakki Bolukoglu,You-Tang Shen,Richard P. Shannon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.06.033
IF: 6.592
2006-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background: Aging is associated with insulin resistance (IR) and also predisposes to worsening heart failure. We sought to determine if IR in the absence of hyperglycemia predisposed to an accelerated course of LV dysfunction following rapid pacing (RVP) in old dogs with documented IR. Methods: Nine young (Y: 4years) and 7 old (O: 11 years) dogs were instrumented with LV pressure gauges (LVP, LVEDP, LVdP/dt), aortic (systolic and diastolic pressure) and coronary sinus catheters, and flow probes on left circumflex (CBF). Dogs underwent measurements of hemodynamics and plasma substrates and a two- hour hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to measure WB and myocardial glucose uptake (MGU) at Baseline. Dogs then underwent RVP (240 min-1) until symptomatic DCM developed. Results: At baseline, there was no difference in body weight (Y: 15 ± 0.6; O: 15 ± 0.4 kg) or plasma glucose (Y: 92 ± 4; O: 95 ± 4 mg/dl) but O had higher (p < 0.02) NEFA (Y: 389 ± 45; O: 796 ± 77 mmol/L); and plasma insulin (Y: 38 ± 6; O: 119 ± 20 pmol/L). Old dogs had impaired WB glucose disposition (Y: 11.5 ± 1; O: 8.0 ± 0.5 mg/kg/min, p < 0.05). While basal MGU was not different (Y: 0.38 ± 0.1; O: 0.34 ± 0.08 mg/min), insulin stimulated MGU was depressed in old dogs (Y: 2.5 ± 0.5; O: 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/min, p < 0.05) consistent with both WB and myocardial IR. Myocardial mitochondria show vaculozation and disruption in old compared to young dogs. Old dogs developed severe symptomatic DCM within 7 days, while severe DCM took 28 days in young dogs (see table). Conclusion: Aging is associated with WB and myocardial IR that predisposes to accelerated course of DCM following RVP in conscious dogs. IR may explain the predisposition of older patients to DCM even in the absence of hyperglycemia. Tabled 1 Young (n = 9) Old (n = 7) Baseline DCM Baseline DCM Pacing (days) 28 ± 2 7 ± 3 † p < 0.01 Y vs. O. LVP (mmHg) 118 ± 6 101 ± 4 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 130 ± 3 † p < 0.01 Y vs. O. 108 ± 3 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. LVEDP (mmHg) 9 ± 1 30 ± 2 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 13 ± 2 29 ± 2 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. LVdP/dt (mmHg/sec) 2890 ± 165 1416 ± 118 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 2792 ± 212 1363 ± 132 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. HR (min¯1) 86 ± 4 112 ± 5 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 95 ± 8 114 ± 9 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. MAP (mmHg) 90 ± 3 83 ± 3 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 104 ± 4 † p < 0.01 Y vs. O. 85 ± 2 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. LVEDD (mm) 38 ± 2 44 ± 2 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. 40 ± 1 44 ± 3 ∗ p < 0.05 compared to baseline. † p < 0.01 Y vs. O. Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?