Potential Prognostic Value of the Lymph Node Ratio and Its Correlation with Circulating Sex Hormone Concentration in Pathological T1/2 Breast Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Study
Wangyu Zhu,Xia Qiu,Nawa Lin,Kexin Fang,Tinglei Zhang,Naohiro Ishii,Warren Matthew Rozen,Alireza Hamidian Jahromi,Jian Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2039
IF: 3.616
2022-01-01
Annals of Translational Medicine
Abstract:Background: The lymph node ratio (LNR) is an additional informative factor complementing anatomic TNM staging in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of LNR in the cancer-specific and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of pT1/2 breast cancer patients and examine its correlation with circulating sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal cases of the cohort from eastern China islands. Methods: Clinical and pathological characteristics, preoperational sex hormone and tumor markers concentrations, and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS were analyzed retrospectively in 732 pathological T1/2 breast cancer patients. Results: The LNR was calculated, and the cut-off value was defined as 0.042 by receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve according to the patient's mortalities. Patients with LNR >= 0.042 exhibited worse BCSS and OS than others (P<0.001) in pT1/2 breast cancer. Among patients with non-triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and TNBC subtypes, the LNR >= 0.042 group also exhibited worse BCSS and OS than the LNR <0.042 group (P=0.003, 0.001, and P=0.032, 0.001, respectively). In univariate analysis, unfavorable BCSS and OS were both related with LNR >= 0.042 (P=0.001, <0.001). However multivariate analysis demonstrated TNBC subtypes were independent predictor for BCSS and OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.449, 95% CI: 1.097-1.914, P=0.009; HR =1.365, 95% CI: 1.093-1.705, P=0.006, respectively]. Notably, Pearson or spearman correlation analysis revealed follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were significantly negatively associated with the LNR (P=0.007, 0.011, respectively) in postmenopausal cases, whereas CA153, CA125 and CEA were positively correlated with it (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.001, respectively) in all cases. Conclusions: Among pT1/2 breast cancer patients from eastern China islands, the LNR is a predictive prognosis factor; a higher LNR seems to correlate with a worse survival outcome both overall and in the subgroups. Strikingly, the current results reveal that serum FSH and LH level inversely associated with axillary node invasion in postmenopausal cases, whereas tumor markers directly related with it. The LNR is an informative factor complementing TNM staging.