Novel analysis of prognosis of young patients with stage II differentiated thyroid cancer based on AJCC 8.0 and 6.0 criteria to implement the staging system

Yihui Huang,Ling Zhou,Wen Zeng,Sichao Chen,Wei Zhou,Wei Wei,Chao Zhang,Di Hu,Min Wang,Zeming Liu,Liang Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-46

2020-01-01

Gland Surgery

Abstract:Background: The incidence of thyroid cancer among young adults is increasing; however, the clinical challenges specific to this population, such as diagnosis, reduced healthcare access, and inconsistent care, have received limited attention. Here, we conducted a subgroup analysis on a series of relatively young patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs), focusing on those with distant metastases at stage II, to obtain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing survival. Methods: Information on <45- or <55-year-old patients at any T/N stage with distant metastasis (M1) was extracted from the SEER database according to the staging system in the 6th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) editions, respectively. Patient mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests. Results: Both cancer-specific and all-cause mortality rates per 1,000 person-years for patients >= 35 years old significantly differed from those of patients <35 years old. DTC-specific survival curves also significantly differed between these age groups, according to both the AJCC 6.0 and 8.0-based analyses (P=0.0017 and P<0.001, respectively), as did patient survival curves (P=0.0003, P<0.001, respectively). The multivariate Cox regression model also revealed that poor OS was strongly predicted by race (P<0.001) in the analysis based on the criteria of 8th AJCC staging system. Conclusions: Age is a risk factor for disease-specific and overall survival (OS) in young patients with stage II DTC, and young male patients exhibited poorer survival than females. Race also emerged as a potential risk factor for young patients in stage II. These findings offer guidance for improving the older and newer versions of the AJCC staging system.