Relative Position of the Central Hole after EVO-ICL Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia

Xiaojian He,Lingling Niu,Huamao Miao,Feng Zhao,Xingtao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C-H) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C-P), and the corneal center (C-C) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. Methods: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients with moderate to high myopia were evaluated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was - 12.58 +/- 4.13D. A routine postoperative follow-up was performed within 1 similar to 12 months. Positions of the C-H of EVO-ICLs, the C(P)and the C(C)were recorded using a slit lamp anterior segment photography system, and their relative distances were calculated with the Visio image analysis software. Results: All surgeries were performed safely, and no complications were observed in follow-ups 4.3 +/- 4.82 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.23 +/- 0.48, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.08 +/- 0.31. The C(H)in 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior to the C-C, with 47.19% (42/89) on the temporal side and 48.31% (43/89) on the nasal side. The C-H in 84 eyes (94.38%) was located on the temporal side of the C-P, with 56.18% (50/89) superior and 38.2% (34/89) inferior to the C-P. The C(P)of 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior on the nasal side of the C-C. On the defined x-axis, the average distance from the C-H to C-C was significantly shorter than the average distance from the C-P to C-C (p < 0.001). Conclusions: An imperfect match between the central hole of EVO-ICLs and the pupil center does not necessarily indicate ICL dislocation. Compared to the pupil center, the position of the central hole of EVO-ICL is closer to the corneal center.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?