Abstract:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Volume 32, Issue 6, June 2022. Previous studies on network robustness mainly concentrated on hub node failures with fully known network structure information. However, hub nodes are often well protected and not accessible to damage or malfunction in a real-world networked system. In addition, one can only gain insight into limited network connectivity knowledge due to large-scale properties and dynamic changes of the network itself. In particular, two different aggression patterns are present in a network attack: memory based attack, in which failed nodes are not attacked again, or non-memory based attack; that is, nodes can be repeatedly attacked. Inspired by these motivations, we propose an attack pattern with and without memory based on randomly choosing [math] non-hub nodes with known connectivity information. We use a network system with the Poisson and power-law degree distribution to study the network robustness after applying two failure strategies of non-hub nodes. Additionally, the critical threshold [math] and the size of the giant component [math] are determined for a network configuration model with an arbitrary degree distribution. The results indicate that the system undergoes a continuous second-order phase transition subject to the above attack strategies. We find that [math] gradually tends to be stable after increasing rapidly with [math]. Moreover, the failure of non-hub nodes with a higher degree is more destructive to the network system and makes it more vulnerable. Furthermore, from comparing the attack strategies with and without memory, the results highlight that the system shows better robustness under a non-memory based attack relative to memory based attacks for [math]. Attacks with memory can block the system's connectivity more efficiently, which has potential applications in real-world systems. Our model sheds light on network resilience under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information attacks and provides valuable insights into designing robust real-world systems.

Securing Network Resilience: Leveraging Node Centrality for Cyberattack Mitigation and Robustness Enhancement

CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF ATTACK STRATEGIESAND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS ON THREE NETWORK MODELS

Resilience centrality in complex networks.

Correlation of Centralities: A Study Through Distinct Graph Robustness

Maximizing Network Resilience against Malicious Attacks

Node Importance Evaluation of Cyber-Physical System under Cyber-Attacks Spreading

Complex networks after centrality-based attacks and defense

Toward More Effective Centrality-Based Attacks on Network Topologies.

Using Mapping Entropy to Identify Node Centrality in Complex Networks

Enhancing robustness of metro networks using strategic defense

Enhancing Network Resilience through Machine Learning-powered Graph Combinatorial Optimization: Applications in Cyber Defense and Information Diffusion

Novel Node Centrality-Based Efficient Empirical Robustness Assessment for Directed Network

Identifying Critical Nodes’ Group in Complex Networks

More Effective Centrality-Based Attacks on Weighted Networks

Multi-hop Based Centrality of a Path in Complex Network

Optimal Allocation of Node Capacity in Cascade-Robustness Networks

Analysis of Network Vulnerability under Joint Node and Link Attacks

The Critical Node Game

Mitigation of Malicious Attacks on Networks

Network resilience of non-hub nodes failure under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information

CSR: A Centrality Based on Robustness and Controllable Subspace of Complex Networks