Abstract:Deep neural network (DNN) accelerators overcome the power and memory walls for executing neural-net models locally on edge-computing devices to support sophisticated AI applications. The advocacy of “model once, run optimized anywhere” paradigm introduces potential new security threat to edge intelligence that is methodologically different from the well-known adversarial examples. Existing adversarial examples modify the input samples presented to an AI application either digitally or physically to cause a misclassification. Nevertheless, these input-based perturbations are not robust or surreptitious on multi-view target. To generate a good adversarial example for misclassifying a real-world target of variational viewing angle, lighting and distance, a decent number of target’s samples are required to extract the rare anomalies that can cross the decision boundary. The feasible perturbations are substantial and visually perceptible. In this paper, we propose a new glitch injection attack on DNN accelerator that is capable of misclassifying a target under variational viewpoints. The glitches injected into the computation clock signal induce transitory but disruptive errors in the intermediate results of the multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations. The attack pattern for each target of interest consists of sparse instantaneous glitches, which can be derived from just one sample of the target. Two modes of attack patterns are derived, and their effectiveness are demonstrated on four representative ImageNet models implemented on the Deep-learning Processing Unit (DPU) of FPGA edge and its DNN development toolchain. The attack success rates are evaluated on 118 objects in 61 diverse sensing conditions, including 25 viewing angles (−60° to 60°), 24 illumination directions and 12 color temperatures. In the covert mode, the success rates of our attack exceed existing stealthy adversarial examples by more than 16.3%, with only two glitches injected into ten thousands to a million cycles for one complete inference. In the robust mode, the attack success rates on all four DNNs are more than 96.2% with an average glitch intensity of 1.4% and a maximum glitch intensity of 10.2%.

Empirial study on security verification and assessment of neural network accelerator

When Single Event Upset Meets Deep Neural Networks: Observations, Explorations, and Remedies

Memory Trojan Attack on Neural Network Accelerators

Hardware Trojan Attacks on Neural Networks

Practical Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Memory Trojaning.

Towards Practical Deployment-Stage Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networks

DSE-Based Hardware Trojan Attack for Neural Network Accelerators on FPGAs.

CLEVEREST: Accelerating CEGAR-based Neural Network Verification via Adversarial Attacks

Adversarial Attacks on Neural-Network-Based Soft Sensors: Directly Attack Output

A Survey of Trojan Attacks and Defenses to Deep Neural Networks

Stealthy and Robust Glitch Injection Attack on Deep Learning Accelerator for Target with Variational Viewpoint.

Verification and Design of Robust and Safe Neural Network-enabled Autonomous Systems

Hu-Fu: Hardware and Software Collaborative Attack Framework against Neural Networks

NeuroAttack: Undermining Spiking Neural Networks Security through Externally Triggered Bit-Flips

Hardware Accelerator for Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Neural Networks

CSI Neural Network: Using Side-channels to Recover Your Artificial Neural Network Information

Hardware Trojan Attacks on the Reconfigurable Interconnections of Field-Programmable Gate Array-Based Convolutional Neural Network Accelerators and a Physically Unclonable Function-Based Countermeasure Detection Technique

AuthNet: Neural Network with Integrated Authentication Logic

Neural Network Model Extraction Attacks in Edge Devices by Hearing Architectural Hints

Live Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networks

An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Trojan Attack in Deep Neural Networks