Enhanced methane production in an up-flow microbial electrolysis assisted reactors: Hydrodynamics characteristics and electron balance under different spatial distributions of bioelectrodes
Lei Gao,Wenzong Liu,Minhua Cui,Yingshi Zhu,Ling Wang,Aijie Wang,Cong Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116813
IF: 12.8
2021-03-01
Water Research
Abstract:<p>Compared with common anaerobic digestion, microbial electrolysis has been proven feasibly to accelerate biodegradation and methanogenesis with the advantages of effective electron flow regulation. However, its actual application and scale-up required a full understanding and further investigation on electrode size and distribution. For making full use of the space of the integrated reactor and improve methane recovery, an effective interior configuration was significant. In this work, three types of reactors with different cathode spatial distributions, that is, different cathode space ratios (ratio of cathode surface area to reaction region volume), were studied to form a good flow pattern for obtaining high methane production. Tracer experiments and numerical simulation were employed simultaneously for understanding the hydrodynamics characters of the interior flow field. The results showed that by increasing the cathode space ratio to 1.33 cm<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup> and 2 cm<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively, better flow patterns with the residence time of 1.336 times and 1.363 times of theoretical hydraulic retention time could be obtained. The stacked structure of nickel meshes was beneficial to prolong the contact time of contaminant and improve the mass transfer. Increasing the cathode space ratio could also enhance the electrochemical performance. Considering the organic removal, methane recovery, electrons generation, and material consumption, the recommended cathode space ratio was 1.33 cm<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>. With this structure, COD removal efficiency reached 93.2 ± 1.9% and 94.1 ± 1.5%, methane production rate reached 332.0 and 334.8 mL CH<sub>4</sub>/L reactor/day, and methane yield was 171.3 and 246.4 mL CH<sub>4</sub>/g COD under the HRT of 24 h and 36 h, respectively.</p>
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources