Abstract:While the textual attributes of corporate financial documents, such as annual reports, have been extensively analyzed in the academic literature, those of corporate sustainability reports, which serve as a critical channel for nonfinancial disclosure, are relatively under-explored. Given the increasing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in corporate strategy and stakeholder evaluation, understanding the role of textual attributes in sustainability reporting is crucial. This study examines 10,021 hand-collected sustainability reports from Chinese firms between 2009 and 2021, focusing on six key textual attributes: length, readability, tone, boilerplate language, redundancy, and completeness. Using computational linguistics, we analyze how these attributes evolve over time and their impact on ESG ratings provided by both international (MSCI, FTSE) and domestic (SNSI) agencies. Our findings reveal that the length and completeness of sustainability reports significantly influence ESG scores across agencies, demonstrating a shared appreciation for detailed and transparent disclosures. However, international and domestic rating agencies exhibit differing responses to attributes like tone, boilerplate language, and redundancy. These differences highlight variations in evaluation standards, methodologies, and value orientations between global and local stakeholders. The results emphasize the need for firms to tailor their sustainability disclosures to meet diverse stakeholder expectations. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on nonfinancial reporting by providing empirical evidence on how specific textual characteristics of sustainability reports can shape ESG evaluations, offering insights for both corporate communicators and policymakers.

Discussion of "textual Analysis and International Financial Reporting: Large Sample Evidence"

Textual Analysis and International Financial Reporting: Large Sample Evidence

Textual Attributes of Corporate Sustainability Reports and ESG Ratings

Can the text features of regulatory inquiry letters predict companies' financial restatements? Evidence from China

The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts

Financial Statement Analysis: Evidence from Chinese Firms

Annual Report Readability and Trade Credit Financing: Evidence from China

Do firms incur financial restatements? A recognition study based on textual features of key audit matters reports

Nonfinancial Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Value: International Evidence on the Role of Financial Analysts

Examining the influence of institutional investors on the readability of environmental disclosure in CSR reports of Chinese listed firms

The Real Effect of Financial Disclosure: International Evidence

Textual Analysis For China'S Financial Markets: A Review And Discussion

Textual Tone in Corporate Financial Disclosures: a Survey of the Literature

Annual Report Readability and the Cost of Equity Capital

IFRS Reporting, Firm-Specific Information Flows, and Institutional Environments: International Evidence

Can Environmental Information Disclosure Enhance Firm Value?—An Analysis Based on Textual Characteristics of Annual Reports

Information Processing Cost and Stock Return Synchronicity - Evidence from XBRL Adoption

Textual analysis in finance

Annual report tone and divergence of opinion: evidence from textual analysis

The effect of financial reporting regimes on audit report lags and audit fees: evidence from firms cross-listed in the USA

Financial Report Readability and Stock Return Synchronicity