Correlation and Agreement of Yttrium-90 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with Ex Vivo Radioembolization Microsphere Deposition in the Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model.

Andrew C. Gordon,Vanessa L. Gates,Sarah B. White,Kathleen R. Harris,Daniel Procissi,Zhuoli Zhang,Weiguo Li,Donald Samaan,Jodi R. Nicolai,Samdeep K. Mouli,Kent T. Sato,Robert K. Ryu,Reed A. Omary,Riad Salem,Robert J. Lewandowski,Andrew C. Larson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.09.016
IF: 3.682
2021-01-01
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Abstract:Purpose: To demonstrate a stronger correlation and agreement of yt trium-90 (Y-90) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) measurements with explant tumor dosing compared with the standard model (SM) for vadioemholization. Materials and Methods: Hepatic VX2 tumors Were implanted into New Zealand white rabbits. with growth confirmed by 7 T magnetic resonance imaging. Seventeen VX2 rabbits provided 33 analyzed tenors. Treatment volumes were calculated from manually drawn volumes of interest (VOI) with three-dimensional surface renderings. Radioembolization was performed with glass Y-90 microsphercs. PET/CT imaging was completed with scatter and attenuation correction. Three-dimensional ellipsoid VOI were drawn to encompass tumors on fused images. Tumors and livers Were then explanted for. inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-optical emission spectroscopy (OES) analysis of microsphere content. PET CT and SM measurements were compared with reference standard ICP- OES measurements of tumor dosing with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses for agreement testing with and without adjustment for tumor necrosis. Results: The median infused activity was 33.3 MBq (range. 5.9-152.9). Tumor dose was significantly correlated with Y-90 PET/CT measurements (r = 0.903. P < .001) and SM estimates (r = 0.607. P < .001). Bland-Altman analyses showed that the SM tended to underestimate the minor dosing by a mean of 8.5 Gy (CI, -26.3-9.3). and the degree of underestimation increased to a mean of 18.3 Gy (CI, 38.5-1.9) after the adjustment for tumor necrosis. Conclusions: Y-90 PET/CT estimates were strongly correlated and had better agreement with reference measurements of tumor dosing than SM estimates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?