Comparison of the Inhibitory Effects of Procyanidins with Different Structures and Their Digestion Products Against Acrylamide-Induced Cytotoxicity in IPEC-J2 Cells

Fangfang Yan,Li Zhao,Wanbing Chen,Qun Lu,Cuie Tang,Chengming Wang,Rui Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2020.104073
IF: 5.6
2020-01-01
Journal of Functional Foods
Abstract:This study evaluated the stabilities of catechin (C), epicatechin (EC), procyanidin B3, procyanidin A1 and epicatechin-(4β → 6)-epicatechin-(2β → O → 7,4β → 8)-catechin (PCA-trimer) during in vitro digestion, as well as characterized their digestion products (DPs), and evaluated their protective effects against ACR-induced cytotoxicity on IPEC-J2 cells. The results showed that procyanidin A1 (70.38%) and procyanidin B3 (15.25%) had the highest and lowest stability in the gastric phase, respectively. During the intestinal phase, the contents of C, EC and procyanidin B3 increased from 57.37%, 49.92% and 15.25% to 88.15%, 71.81% and 46.72%, while those of procyanidin A1 and PCA-trimer showed continuous decreases to 27.13% and 28.89%, respectively. Isomerism, hydrolysis and condensation reactions were found to play major roles in in vitro digestion. Besides, procyanidin A1 and its DPs exhibited the best protective effect against ACR-induced cytotoxicity compared with other compounds and their DPs, as indicated by MTT assay and measurement of glutathione (GSH).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?