Abstract:The authors noticed that in their Full Paper the charges on the nitrogen atoms in Figure 3 were calculated incorrectly. The correct values are given in Figure 3 and in Tables 14, 15, and 16 (of the Supporting Information) below. NBO analysis of 4 a, 9 a, and 10 a (charge densities: Tables S14, S15, and S16 in the Supporting Information). N1 −0.245 N2 −0.245 N3 −0.245 N4 −0.245 N5 −0.865 N6 −0.865 C1 0.484 C2 0.484 N1 −0.218 N2 −0.247 N3 −0.171 N4 −0.242 N5 −0.849 N6 −0.240 N7 −0.263 C1 −0.500 C2 −0.497 C3 −0.046 C4 −0.349 C5 −0.037 N1 −0.209 N2 −0.243 N3 −0.169 N4 −0.240 N5 −0.843 N6 −0.259 N7 −0.277 N8 −0.498 C1 0.504 C2 0.489 C3 0.144 C4 0.204 In the second column of page 16945, the second sentence of the second paragraph should read “In the case of 4 a, for example, NBO analysis shows that the charges on N1, N2, N3, and N4 are identical (Figure 3).” In the first column of page 16946, the third and fourth sentence of the first paragraph should read “The NBO analysis supports the experimental results showing that N2 and N4 on 9 a and 10 a are more negatively charged than their N1 and N3 atoms. Therefore, the electron-withdrawing groups actually have little impact on the electronic densities of N2 and N4 in the tetrazine system.” Additionally, because of the incorrect measurement of densities of compounds 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 17, the densities and the calculated detonation velocities and pressures are incorrect. The correct values are given in Table 4 below. Td[b] [°C] ρ[c] [g cm−3] νD[f] [m s−1] P[g] [GPa] 8 242 1.52 6954 15.9 9 1.61 7455 19.8 10 1.69 7891 23.3 12 1.64 7521 20.5 15 1.72 8138 26.2 17 1.77 8611 31.2 Furthermore, Figure 7 compares incorrect densities. The correct densities are given in Figure 7 below, including the corrected experimental values for 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 17 and the concomitant corrected experimental values for each of their precursors (8 a, 9 a, 10 a, 12 a, 15 a, and 17 a). Bar diagram comparing the densities of 6–17 with 6 a–17 a. In the second column of page 16947, the last two sentences of the paragraph Thermal behavior should read “All compounds are thermally stable with decomposition temperatures (onset temperatures) ranging from 110 (16) to 242 (8) °C.” In the second column of page 16947, the first two sentences of the paragraph Properties should read “The experimentally determined densities of 6–17 range between 1.52 and 1.92 g cm−3 equal or exceed that of common explosives. Moreover, the outstanding high density of 16 (1.92 g cm−3, literature data[13e] 1.919 g cm−3) is a consequence of the N-oxide and nitro groups being involved in multiple intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions and is comparable with HMX (1.91 g cm−3).” In the first column of page 16949, the fourth sentence of the first paragraph and onwards until the end of this paragraph should read “As can be seen from Table 4, the calculated detonation velocities lie between νD=6954 and νD=9316 m s−1. The highest values in terms of detonation velocity were observed for compounds 16 (9316 m s−1) and 14 (8884 m s−1), all of which exceed RDX. In comparison with other tetrazine derivatives, an improved performance is seen resulting from the introduction of N-oxide groups. The detonation pressures of N-oxide and di-N-oxides tetrazine derivatives lie in the range between P=15.9 and 39.4 GPa (compared to RDX 34.9 GPa, and octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) 39.5 GPa).” In the first column of page 16949, the seventh sentence of the paragraph Conclusion should read “A majority of these compounds shows an equivalent or higher density (in the range of 1.52–1.92 g cm−3) than RDX and 16 and 17 are comparable with HMX.” The authors apologize for the oversight.

Density Functional Theory Studies of Effects of Boron Replacement on the Structure and Property of RDX and HMX

Theoretical Insight into Different Energetic Groups on the Performance of Energetic Materials Featuring RDX Ring

Theoretical Studies on the Performance of HMX with Different Energetic Groups

Design and Properties of N,N’-linked Bis-1,2,4-triazoles Compounds As Promising Energetic Materials

Molecular design of energetic tetrazine-triazole derivatives

Density Functional Theory (DFT) Study on the Structures and Energetic Properties of Isomers of Tetranitro-bis-1,2,4-triazoles.

Theoretical calculation into the effect of molar ratio on the structures, stability, mechanical properties and detonation performance of 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocane/ 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyco-hexane cocrystal

Molecular Design of a New Family of Bridged Bis(multinitro‐triazole) with Outstanding Oxygen Balance As High‐density Energy Compounds

High-nitrogen nitrotetrazole substituted tetrazole 3-N-oxides as potential high energy density compounds

Computational Design and Screening of Promising Energetic Materials: Novel Azobis(tetrazoles) with Ten Catenated Nitrogen Atoms Chain

Molecular Design And Property Prediction Of High Density Polynitro[3.3.3]-Propellane-Derivatized Frameworks As Potential High Explosives

Corrigendum: N‐Oxide 1,2,4,5‐tetrazine‐based High‐Performance Energetic Materials

The Coplanar Family of Bis(nitrotriazoles) Tetrazine and Oxides Based As Energetic Compounds

Tri-explosophoric Groups Driven Fused Energetic Heterocycles Featuring Superior Energetic and Safety Performances Outperforms HMX.

Internal Explosion Performance of RDX@Nano-B Composite Explosives

Computational Investigation and Screening of High-Energy-Density Materials: Based on Nitrogen-Rich 1,2,4,5-Tetrazine Energetic Derivatives

THEORETICAL STUDIES ON THE NEW HIGH-NITROGEN EXPLOSIVES N14 AND N18

Theoretical studies of novel high energy density materials based on oxadiazoles

Theoretical investigation on intermolecular interactions between the ingredients TNT and RDX of composition B

Molecular Dynamics Study of RDX/AMMO Propellant

Theoretical investigation of nitrogen-rich high-energy-density materials based on furazan substituted s-triazine