Mechanism of Mitochondrial ATP-sensitive Potassium Channel Blocker in Ischemic Postconditioning on Lung Ischemic Reperfusion Injury in Rats in Vivo
QI Hai-jie,XIA Jun,WANG Zhi-wei,DAI Fei-feng,XU Peng,LUO Bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2011.08.017
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the protective effect of ischemic postconditioning (IPO) on lung ischemic reperfusion (L/R) in rats in vivo and the mechanism of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel (mitoKATP) blocker in the ischemic postconditioning. Methods Thirty five Wistar rats were randomly divided into 5 groups: sham group, I/R group, ischemic postconditioning (IPO) group, I/R +5-hydroxydecanoate (I/R + 5-HD) group, IPO + 5-HD group. The concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) and activity of superoide dismutase (SOD) were determined in the lung homogenate, wet to dry weight ratio (W/D) was measured and pathological changes were also observed. Results The levels of MDA[(5.07±1.60) vs (1.43 ±0.41) nmol/mg prot,P<0. 01]and W/D (5.45 ±0.82 vs 3.05 ±0. 47,P <0. 01 ) were increased significantly in I/R group as compared with sham group, while the activity of SOD[( 12. 38 ±2. 24) vs (45.51 ±5.42) U/mg prot,P <0. 01]was decreased, and the injury of lung tissues was significantly aggravated in IPO + 5-HD group as compared with IPO group[MDA: (3.74 ±0. 71 ) nmol/mg prot vs (2. 60 ± 0. 43 ) nmol/mg prot , P < 0. 01]; W/D: 4. 64 ± 0. 79 vs 3. 89 ± 0. 60,P<0.01; SOD:[(22.91 ±2.71) U/mg prot vs (28.74±2.03) U/mg prot,P<0. 01]. The levels of MDA[(2.60±0.43) vs (5.07 ±1.60) nmol/mg prot,P<0. 01]and W/D (3.89 ±0.60 vs 5.45 ±0. 82,P <0. 01 ) were decreased significantly in IPO group as compared with I/R group, the activity of SOD[(28.74±2.03) vs (12.38 ±2.24) U/mg prot,P<0. 01]increased and lung tissue histological damage attenuated. The difference in MDA[(5.14 ± 1.30) vs (5.07 ± 1.60) nmol/mg prot, P > 0. 05],W/D (5.54±0.61 vs5.45 ±0.82,P>0.05) and SOD[(11.65 ±1.82) vs (12.38 ±2.24) U/mgprot,P > 0. 05]levels had no statistical significance between I/R + 5-HD group and I/R group, and the injury of lung tissues had no significant difference too. Each index in IPO + 5-HD group was between IPO and I/R groups. Conclusion Ischemic postconditioning can attenuate the lung I/R injury, and mitoKATP plays a vital role in the protective procession of ischemic postconditioning on lung ischemic reperfusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?