Experiment study of Cerenkov luminescence imaging and gamma scintigraphy with 131I-NGR in tumor

Yang Weidong,Hu Zhenhua,Ma Xiaowei,Zhou Yuanyuan,Zhou Shuang,Li Congye,Liang Jimin,Tian Jie,Wang Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2013.04.013
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the differences and characteristics between Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) and gamma scintigraphy with 131I-NGR in tumor imaging and to evaluate an effective method for imaging tumor by combining both techniques.Methods (1) The 131I sources with radioactivity of 185 kBq and 1.85 MBq were placed at the chest skin surface of 4 mice.CLI and gamma scintigraphy of the surface sources were performed at different peritoneal background by intraperitoneal injection of with different radioactivities (0 kBq,740 kBq and 7.4 MBq).(2) The uptakes of 131 I-NGR under various radioactivities (0,231,463,925,1850 kBq) in CD13-positive HTI080 cells and CD13-negative HP29 cells were evaluated by CLI and gamma scintigraphy.The multi-phase imaging of CLI and gamma scintigraphy for the tumor bearing nude mice was acquired at 2,4,8 and 12 h after injection of 18.5 MBq 131I-NGR.The tumor was resected and implanted at peritoneum for CLI and gamma scintigraphy 12 h post-injection.Results (1) Both CLI and gamma scintigraphy were able to clearly visualize surface sources with radioactivities of 185 kBq and 1.85 MBq.However,the signal on gamma scintigraphy decreased with increased radioactivity in peritoneal cavity.When the peritoneal cavity was injected with 7.4 MBq,the surface source of 185 kBq could not be identified and the source of 1.85 MBq was greatly underestimated.However,Cerenkov signals were less affected by the background activity of peritoneal cavity.Both sources of 185 kBq and 1.85 MBq could be clearly visualized under the background of 7.4 MBq.(2) Both gamma scintigraphy and CLI could show CD13-positive HT1080 cells and were negative for CD13-negative HP29 cells.The higher the dose of 131I-NGR was,the binding with HT1080 cells was more.Subcutaneous tumors could be clearly identified at 2 h by CLI after injection of 18.5 MBq 131I-NGR,but could only be clearly detected by gamma scintigraphy at 12 h.When the tumor was resected and implanted in peritoneal cavity,it could only be detected by gamma scintigraphy.Conclusions CLI is better for detecting surface tumors at its early stage,while gamma scintigraphy is a better choice for the detection of tumor in the body.Combined use of CLI and gamma scintigraphy might improve tumor detection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?