Application of Colonoscopic Polyp Size Measurement Methods of Colorectal Lateral Spread Tumor

林慧萍,章秀,刘萍,马云,金黑鹰,冷强,姚航,吴崑岚
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2015.06.009
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the accuracy and application value of endoscopic polyp size measurement of colorectal lateral spread tumor (LST).Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with colorectal LST who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from August 2013 to October 2014 were prospectively analyzed.Disposable graduated biopsy forceps (DGBF) and endoscopic lesion measurement system (ELMS) were used to evaluate the length and width of LST and the results were compared with the actual size after resection.Patients were followed up via outpatient examination or telephone interview till December 2014.Data with normal distribution were expressed by x ± s,and were analyzed using the ANOVA or the LSD-t test.Results Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study.Sixty-two LSTs were detected in the 54 patients,including 1 ployp in transverse colon,13 ployps in ascending colon and cecum,6 ployps in descending colon,24 ployps in sigmoid colon and 18 ployps in rectum.The average length of the LST was (1.1 ±0.5)cm measured by the DGBF,(1.1 ±0.5)cm by the ELMS and (1.0 ±0.4)cm by the pathological examination,with no significant difference (F =1.306,P > 0.05).The mean width of the LST was (1.1 ±0.6)cm by the DGBF,(0.7 ±0.4)cm by the ELMS and (0.7 ±0.4)cm by the pathological examination,with significant difference (F =9.214,P < 0.05).There was significant difference in the width of the LSTs measured by the DGBF between that measured by the ELMS and by the pathological examination (t =7.074,9.852,P < 0.05).All the 54 patients were followed up with the median time of 10 months (range,2-16 months).All the 54 patients were well survived without residual LSTs or recurrence and canceration of LSTs.Conclusions DGBF and ELMS could accurately measure the length and width of the LSTs,while DGBF is more accurate to measure the width of the LSTs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?