Improved locoregional control with conventional radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy for patients with T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer

吴涛,王淑莲,金晶,刘跃平,王维虎,宋永文,余子豪,刘新帆,张江鹄
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2014.02.001
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the role of conventional radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy for women with T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Methods From 1996 to 2010,215 patients diagnosed with T1-2N1M0 TNBC were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were treated with modified radical mastectomy (MRM).Of them,66 patients received postmastectomy conventional radiotherapy and 146 patients did not.Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups with or without propensity-score matching methods.Results With a median follow-up of 56 months,36 patients developed locoregional recurrence (LRR).The 5-year LRRFS and OS rates were 92.6% and 82.8% for MRM compared with 76.6% (P =0.010) and 84.7 (P =0.499) for postmastectomy conventional radiotherapy,respectively.In multivariate analysis,MRM and T2 were associated with increased LRR.In matched-pair of radiotherapy and no radiotherapy using propensity-score matching methods,the 5-year LRRFS was 92.6% for MRM plus RT compared with 74.5% for MRM (P=0.008).Multivariate analysis indicated that no radiotherapy was the only independent prognostic factorassociated with increased LRR (HR =3.536,95% CI =1.153-10.844 ;P =0.027).Conclusions Patients with T1-2 N1 M0 TNBC treated with MRM without RT appear to be at an increased risk for LBR compared with those treated with MRM and RT.Prospective studies are warranted to investigate the benefit of postmastectomy conventional radiotherapy to improve the outcome of patients in T1-2N1M0 TNBC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?