Therapeutic Effect of Endoscopy for Anastomotic and Nonanastomotic Biliary Strictures after Liver Transplantation
CAI Xiao-bo,ZHU Feng,WENG Jian-jun,LI Lei,LUO Sheng-zheng,LI Bai-wen,WAN Xin-jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2012.07.008
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of endoscopy for patients with anastomotic or nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation.Methods Clinical and follow-up data of 56 patients,38 (67.9％) with anastomotic strictures (AS),and 18 (32.1％) with nonanastomotic strictures (NAS) after liver transplantation,who underwent endoscopic therapy were collected and analyzed.Results Compared to AS patients,NAS patients showed shorter time from liver transplantation to initial presentation (4.45 ± 1.47 vs.8.00 ±2.31 months,P =0.000),underwent more ERCP procedures (6.20 ±1.28 vs.4.11 ± 1.51,P =0.000) and received more stents (10.20 ±3.59 vs.7.53 ±2.12,P =0.001).Although the success rate was not statistically different,patients with NAS needed longer treatment duration and had higher recurrence rate (50.0％ vs.18.2％,P =0.033) as well as shorter duration from treatment to recurrence.Among patients with AS,the treatment failure group had longer stricture length (13.00 ±3.61 vs.6.63 ±2.09,P =0.000) than the success group and the patients who experienced recurrence had longer stricture length (10.48 ± 1.07 vs.5.86 ± 1.55,P =0.000) and narrower stricture diameter (1.52 ± 0.38 vs.1.94 ± 0.32,P =0.001).Among NAS patients,the multiple biliary strictures group had lower success rate and higher recurrence rate,but with no statistical significance (62.5％ vs.90.0％,P =0.275 and 66.7％ vs.37.5％,P =0.592,recpectively).Conclusion NAS patients have lower response to endoscopic treatment than AS patients.The length and diameter of biliary stricture in AS as well as the number of stricture in NAS may influent the effect of endoscopic treatment.