Investigation on the Application of Hepatic Vein Classification in Liver Transplantation and Strategy for Drawbacks
叶啟发,范林,明英姿,王彦峰,钟自彪,李弦,成柯,范晓礼
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2014.04.001
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the hepatic vein (HV) classification and its common drawbacks in the application of the liver transplantation (LT) and explore the solution for the problems.Methods Retrospectively,data of 248 patients with LT performed from May 2000 to August 2007 were analyzed.The hepatic veins of 248 recipients had been classified into 5 types:Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ-A,Ⅳ-B,Ⅴ.Based on the piggyback liver transplantation (PBLT) technology and the HV classification,we implemented classical piggyback liver transplantation (CPBLT),ameliorative piggyback liver transplantation (APBLT) and classical orthotopic liver transplantation (COLT).Results 136 cases of Type Ⅰ (left and middle hepatic vein common trunk) was implemented with CPBLT,of which 6 cases underwent HV separation failure.Thirtyfour cases developed Budd-chiari syndrome (BCS):immediate BCS (n =14,9.85％),acute BCS (n =18,12.67％),chronic BCS (n =2,1.40％).The hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) was improved through the application of surgery aiming at reducing portal pressure and stenting in retrohepatic inferior vena cava (RHIVC).No HVOO occurred in the 54 cases with Type Ⅱ (right and middle hepatic vein common trunk)who underwent CPBLT surgery,including two cases with the HV surrounded by tumor diverted into COLT.The best choice for the patients with Type Ⅲ (three hepatic veins common trunk) of HV is CPBLT and no HVOO occurred.Sixteen cases with Type Ⅳ-A (three hepatic veins coaxial) accepted CPBLT with 2 cases diverted to APBLT after vessel molding failure.APBLT (n =9) and COLT (n =9) were performed in 18 cases with Type Ⅳ-B (three hepatic veins non-coaxial).Four cases of Type V (liver segment type,no three constant hepatic vein) underwent APBLT (n =2) and COLT (n =2).Three cases in APBLT and COLT implementations got BCS respectively and achieved symptoms remission after stenting in RHIVC 1 to 3 months after surgery.Conclusions The techniques of liver transplantation could be applied in a reasonable manner based on the HV classification.We chose the CPBLT for patients with Type Ⅰ HV,which is prone to twist and induce HVOO because hepatic vein goes left.Thus,the incidences of immediate,acute and chronic BCS were high.No HVOO occurred after CPBLT in cases with Type Ⅱ and Ⅲ HV undergoing CPBLT.The best choice for cases with Type Ⅲ ⅡⅤ is CPBLT.Type Ⅳ-A should better accept CPBLT,and APBLT can be used if molding fails.Patients with Type Ⅳ-B can only undergo APBLT or COLT,while cases with Type Ⅴ can only have APBLT or COLT.But it is common to see the occurrence of BCS in the orthotopic LT which included the APBLT or COLT,but a variety of HVOO,have no effect on the prognosis of OLT,can be improved by the appropriate measures and medical treatment surgery.