Abstract:Patient-specific computer models of MR were created for validation of PISA methodsPISA area is subject to systematic underestimation due to Doppler angle effectRegurgitant flow rate is subject to systematic overestimation due to flow direction angleIntegrated PISA is more robust than peak PISA for regurgitant volume quantificationMitral regurgitation (MR) quantification by proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method remains challenging. Using computer models, this study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different PISA methods and quantify their errors.Five functional MR (FMR) computer models of different geometric and tethering abnormalities were created, validated and treated as phantom models, from which the reference values were directly obtained. Virtual 2D and 3D PISA (both peak and integrated values) were performed on these phantom models. By comparing virtual PISA results with reference values, the accuracy of different PISA methods was evaluated, and their sources of errors were quantified.Compared to reference values of regurgitant flow rate, excellent correlations were found for true-PISA (r = 0.99, bias 32.3 ± 35.3 ml/s), 3D-PISA (r = 0.97, bias -24.4 ± 55.5 ml/s), followed by multiplane 2D hemicylindrical (HC)-PISA (r = 0.88, bias -24.1 ± 85.4 ml/s), hemiellipsoidal (HE)-PISA (r = 0.91, bias -55.7 ± 96.6 ml/s). Weaker correlations were found for single plane 2D hemispherical (HS)-PISA (PLAX: r = 0.71, bias -77.6 ± 124.5 ml/s; A2Ch: r = 0.69, bias -52.0 ± 122.0 ml/s; A4Ch: r = 0.82, bias -65.5 ± 107.3 ml/s). For regurgitant volume quantification, integrated PISA was more accurate than peak PISA. The bias of 3D PISA improved from -12.7 ± 7.8 ml (peak PISA) to -2.1 ± 5.3 ml (integrated PISA).For FMR quantification, 2D HS-PISA had significant underestimation, multiplane 2D HE- and HC-PISA showed improve accuracy, while 3D-PISA is the most accurate. PISA method is subject to both systematic underestimation due to Doppler angle effect, and systematic overestimation when regurgitant flow is not perpendicular to PISA contour. Integrated PISA is able to capture the dynamic MR and is therefore more accurate than peak PISA. The sum of regurgitant flow rates is the most feasible way to perform integrated PISA.<ol class="links-for-figure"><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S089473172100554X-fx1_lrg.jpg">Download : Download high-res image (235KB)</a></li><li><a class="anchor download-link u-font-sans" href="https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S089473172100554X-fx1.jpg">Download : Download full-size image</a></li></ol>

Preliminary Study about Practical Value of Quantification of Mitral Stenosis by Using Proximal Flow Convergence Method

Methodological Study of Flow Field Uniformity of Mitral Valve Using Vector Flow Mapping

Assessment of Left Atrial Strain in Patients Pre-and Post-Mitral Valvuloplasty by Using Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography

Utility of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Intraoperative Assessment of Mltral Valve Repair

Clinical values of intraoperative real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for surgery in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Preliminary Study on the Evaluation of Mitral Annulus Displacement in Normal Fetuses by Automated Cardiac Motion Quantitation

Feasibility of Three Dimensional Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area in Quantitative Evaluate Mitral Regurgitation

Investigating the shortcomings of the Flow Convergence Method for quantification of Mitral Regurgitation in a pulsatile in-vitro environment and with Computational Fluid Dynamics

A Real-Time 3-Dimensional Digital Doppler Method for Measurement of Flow Rate and Volume Through Mitral Valve in Children: a Validation Study Compared with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Mitral Regurgitation Quantification from Multi-channel Ultrasound Images via Deep Learning

Clinical application of mitral valve quantitative analysis with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

Computational Analysis of Virtual Echocardiographic Assessment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation for Validation of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Methods

Assessment of Left Ventricle Volume Filling Curve with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Preliminary Study

Quantification of Left‐side Intracardiac Pressures and Gradients Using Mitral and Aortic Regurgitant Velocities by Simultaneous Left and Right Catheterization and Continuous‐wave Doppler Echocardiography

Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Prolapse by Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta Area: Derived Cutoff Values and Comparison With Two-Dimensional Multiparametric Approach

Real-time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Quantitative Assessment of Congenital Mitral Regurgitation

Hemodynamic testing using three-dimensional printing and computational fluid dynamics preoperatively may provide more information in mitral repair than traditional image dataset

Comparison of the effective orifice area of prosthetic mitral valves using two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Assessment of function on left atrial and biventricular in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis before and after percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Mitral Regurgitation Patients Using Three-Dimensional Strain and Doppler Parameters

Automatic 3D mitral valve leaflet segmentation and validation of quantitative measurement