Clinical Application and Outcome of the Free Ulnar Artery Perforator Flap for Soft-Tissue Reconstruction of Fingers in Five Patients
Chengwei Xiao,Qiyuan Bao,Tao Wang,Feng Peng,Yudong Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318272a183
2013-01-01
Abstract:Sir:FigureCauses of soft-tissue defects of the finger include trauma, infection, burn, ischemia, neoplasm, and others. It is still a challenge for surgeons to resurface the skin of fingers. Reconstructive options for finger defects include regional flaps such as the dorsal intermetacarpal flap, cross-finger flaps, adipofascial flaps, hypothenar flap, and others. However, to achieve good appearance and hand function, the free ulnar artery perforator flap is one of the ideal options, especially for volar or dorsal defects of fingers with exposure of tendon and bone, because it is more reliable, versatile, and convenient than other flaps as described by Lovie et al.1 We have performed reconstruction in five patients by using free ulnar artery perforator flaps for volar or dorsal defects of fingers. The perforator artery was located between the flexor carpi ulnaris and the flexor digitorum superficialis approximately 12 cm away from the pisiform bone on the axis line that extended from the brachial artery pulsation point at the elbow to the pisiform bone (Fig. 1). After harvesting the flap's perforator artery and its concomitant vein accompanied by a superficial vein, these vessels were anastomosed with the recipient vessels (digital artery and dorsal veins of the hand) (Fig. 2). There could be a terminal branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve sometimes that was used to recover the sensation of the flap in end-to-side fashion to the digital nerve (case 2). The flap sizes ranged from 5.5 × 2.5 cm to 7 × 2 cm. The pedicle length of the perforator artery ranged from 1.5 to 3 cm (average, 2.4 cm) (Table 1). Our mean follow-up period was 25 months (range, 19 to 40 months). At the last follow-up, two-point discrimination ranged from 8 to 14 mm (average, 10.8 mm) and the active range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was similar to that of the normal fingers (range, 70 to 90 degrees). The patients were satisfied with the overall result. No patient was bothered by pain, anesthesia, hypesthesia, or paresthesia of the donor site.Fig. 1: An exploratory incision was made along the axis line to make sure that there was a perforator artery.Fig. 2: The free flap was transplanted to the wound finger by one artery and two vein anastomoses.Table 1: Patient DataThe perforator point of the ulnar artery is consistent and could be found at the axis line approximately 12 cm from the pisiform bone. Our result is similar to the result of Dr. Peirong Yu et al.2 They also found that there was a primary perforator artery at 12 cm from the pisiform bone. The greatest advantage of the free ulnar artery perforator flap is that it does not sacrifice the ulnar artery. Also, it decreases the risk of ulnar nerve injury, because we just harvest the perforator artery and keep the ulnar artery intact without any chance of touching the ulnar nerve. The flap is thin, hairless, and pliable, which is proper for finger soft-tissue reconstruction. The donor site could be closed primarily without any other skin graft. The major disadvantage is that skilled technique is needed for vascular anastomosis. However, for a trained hand surgeon, the microscopy skills are not an impediment. Therefore, it is one of best choices for soft-tissue defect reconstruction of the finger for both the volar and the dorsal sides. Chengwei Xiao, M.D., Ph.D. Qiyuan Bao, M.D., Ph.D. Tao Wang, M.D., Ph.D. Feng Peng, M.D., Ph.D. Yudong Gu, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health; and, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, People's Republic of China DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. No funding was received for this study.