Morphological characteristics of developmental dysplasia of the hip: Three-dimensional CT evaluation
Q Jie,J Meng,L Zhao,Y Huan,JS Zhang,JF Wang,L Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.23.023
2007-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate acetabular growth condition by detecting the acetabular coverage with three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT).METHODS: ①Forty-one patients (55 hip joints, 12 males and 29 females) with developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH), aged 18 months to 6 years, were selected from June 2003 to April 2005. There were 23 hips affected in right, 32 in left, 12 in bilateral, and 27 healthy hips. The informed consent was obtained from the family of patients. ②All patients were examined with PQ6000 CT from anterior inferior iliac spine to lesser trochanter. The scanning data were transmitted to the CT workstation for 3D reconstruction. The diagram was drawn and quantized according to the data to present the 3D acetabular growth condition and reflect the acetabular dysplasia. ③The means, standard deviations, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals for the acetabular index (AI), and center-edge angles (CEAs) at various sections were determined. The skeletal morphological alternations were observed before and after the reduction of dislocation; the AI, CEAs and anteversion angles (AA) of affected sides were evaluated pre-and post-operatively, and the data were compared with the normal values.RESULTS: Both 55 affected hips and 27 normal ones were involved in the result analysis. ①The degrees of pre-operative DDH were defined by Tonnis methods: grade Ⅰ in 5 hips (9.1%), gradeⅡ in 11 hips (20%), grade Ⅲ in 32 hips (58.2%), and grade Ⅳ in 7 hips (12.7%). After operation, the acetabular α was more than 90°, and the femoral head was cocentric circle paratope; Shenton line became continuous, and the femoral head was significantly developed compared with that before operation. The skeletal abnormalities were revealed in DDH in terms of acetabulum, femoral head and congruous relationship between acetabulum and femoral head. ②There was no significant difference in AI and AA between control group and postoperative group (P > 0.05), and the CEAs of patients after operation were larger than those of control group [(33.4±2.6)°, (29.1±2.0)°, P < 0.01]. The AI and AA of postoperative patients were decreased than before operation (P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: This new method could fully reflect the acetabular growth. It deepens the recognition to the pathological changes of center-edge acetabulum, and provides accurate and reliable surgical design proposals.