Abstract:Abstract Background In vivo corneal biomechanics evaluation has been used to help screen early keratoconus in recent years. This study is to evaluate the value of a Scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser combined with tomography in detecting subclinical keratoconus by distinguishing normal eyes from frank keratoconus (KC) and forme frusta keratoconus (FFKC) eyes in Chinese patients. Methods Study design: diagnostic test. This study included 31 bilateral frank keratoconus patients, 27 unilateral clinically manifesting keratoconus patients with very asymmetric eyes, and 79 control subjects with normal corneas. Corneal morphological and biomechanical parameters were measured using a Pentacam HR and a Corvis ST (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany). The diagnostic ability of computed parameters reflecting corneal biomechanical and morphological traits [including the Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD_D), the Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) and the tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI)] was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared by the DeLong test. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC), the best cut-off values, and the Youden index for each parameter were reported. A novel corneal stiffness parameter, the stress-strain index (SSI), was also compared between KC, FFKC and normal eyes. Results Every morphological and biomechanical index analysed in this study was significantly different among KC, FFKC and normal eyes (P = 0.000). The TBI was most valuable in detecting subclinical keratoconus (FFKC eyes), with an AUC of 0.928 (P = 0.000), and both forms of corneal ectasia (FFKC and frank KC eyes), with an AUC of 0.966 (P = 0.000). The sensitivity and specificity of the TBI was 97.5 and 77.8 % in detecting FFKC and 97.5 and 89.7 % in detecting any KC, respectively, with a cut-off value of 0.375. The morphological index BAD_D and the biomechanical index CBI were also very useful in distinguishing eyes with any KC from normal eyes, with AUCs of 0.965 and 0.934, respectively. The SSI was significantly different between KC, FFKC and normal eyes (P = 0.000), indicating an independent decrease in corneal stiffness in KC eyes. Conclusions The combination of a Scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography could increase the accuracy in detecting subclinical keratoconus in Chinese patients. The TBI was the most valuable index for detecting subclinical keratoconus, with a high sensitivity and specificity. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in refractive surgery candidates could be helpful for recognizing potential keratoconic eyes and increasing surgical safety.

A Comparison of Corneal Topography between Subclinical Keratoconus and Simple High Myopic Astigmatism Using a Pentacam Analyzer

Clinical Study on the Differential Diagnosis of High Myopia Astigmatism and Subclinical Keratoconus in Adolescents by Pentacam Anterior Segment Analyzer

The role of the posterior corneal parameters measured by Pentacam in subclinical keratoconus screening

Posterior Surface Topography of Early Keratoconus Patients

Research on posterior surface topography of keratoconus with Pentacam

Quantitative Evaluation of Keratoconus Patients' Corneal Topography

Evaluation of Corneal Thickness and Volume Parameters of Subclinical Keratoconus Using a Pentacam Scheimflug System.

Comparative study of the corneal morphological characteristics of keratoconus evaluated using CASIA2, Sirius, and Pentacam

Research of diagnostic value of corneal biomechanical parameters based on Corvis ST in keratoconus

Comparison of bilateral differential characteristics of corneal biomechanics between keratoconus and normal eyes

Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages

Obscan II Topography Sensitive Indices to Aid in Screening for Early Keratoconus

Application of Scheimpflug-Based Biomechanical Analyzer and Tomography in Early Detecting of Subclinical Keratoconus in Chinese Patients

Application of a Scheimpflug-Based Biomechanical Analyser and Tomography in the Early Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus in Chinese Patients

[Corneal Topography and Thickness in Keratoconus].

Clinical Analysis of Measuring Corneal Thickness with Non-Contact Method

Comparison of a Scheimpflug imaging with other screening indices in diagnosing keratoconus and keratoconus suspect

Analysis of densitometry of keratoconus

Bilateral Differential Topography—A Novel Topographic Algorithm for Keratoconus and Ectatic Disease Screening

Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Pentacam Corneal Astigmatism Values in Non-Toric Pseudophakic Eyes

A compare study on cornea biomechanical properties in normal and keratoconic eyes