Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) Identifies a New Breast Cancer Subtype with HER2 Low-Amplification Status As a Candidate for Targeted Therapy.

Guo-Chun Zhang,Ning Liao,Bo Chen,Jiali Lin,Jianguo Lai,Weikai Xiao,Chong-Yang Ren,Ling-Zhu Wen,XueRui Li,Yulei Wang,Kai Li,Li Cao,Minghan Jia,Min Li,Analyn Lizaso,Han,Hao Liu,Lu Zhang,Jing Liu,Zhou Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.553
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:553 Background: HER2 expression or amplification qualify patients to receive targeted therapeutics against HER2; however, traditional methods of quantifying HER2 amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) do not include a reliable definition for low level amplification. With the promising response rate of patients with low HER2 amplified-metastatic breast cancer to subsequent-line trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) therapy, there is a need to improve the existing criteria to accurately identify patients with low HER2. In our study, we investigate whether HER2 amplification quantified by NGS could provide a method to stratify patients into subgroups. Methods: A total of 774 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) who underwent targeted NGS using 520 or 33 cancer-related genes and had their HER2 status evaluated with either FISH or IHC were included in this study. HER2 status were defined as per 2018 ASCO/ACP guidelines. Results: Our results demonstrate that NGS could quantify HER2 amplification with high sensitivity and specificity, with area under the curve of 0.990 [95%CI: 0.982-0.999]. The receiver operating curve indicated an optimal cut-off of 2.62 copy number (CN) for identifying IHC/FISH HER2-negative status with 97.8% specificity. Meanwhile, the cut-off of ≥ 3.62 CN identified patients with IHC/FISH HER2-positive status with 99.8% specificity. Among the 774 patients, 65.8% (n = 509) had HER2 CN of ≤ 2.62 and were classified as HER2 non-amplified, while 25.8% (n = 199) had HER2 CN of ≥ 3.62, classified as HER2-amplified. The remaining 66 patients (8.5%) had HER2 CN between 2.62 and 3.62, and were the patients with heterogeneous IHC/FISH results, classified using NGS as HER2 low-amplified. Patients with low-amplified (49.0% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001) and amplified (50.3% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001) HER2 had significantly more number of copy number amplifications in other gene, including CDK12, RARA, and SPOP (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) than patients with HER2 non-amplified, indicating distinct mutation profile. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that NGS could provide a more accurate stratification of patients based on their HER2 amplification levels. Patients with low levels of HER2 amplification has a distinct mutation profile, suggesting that NGS could serve as a robust tool to identify patients with HER2 amplification, whether high or low, who could benefit treatment with targeted agents designed against heterogeneous HER2 expression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?