Role of Low Dose Iodine Contrast Enhancement in Abdomen Using Gemstone Spectral CT in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

林晓珠,福井利佳,沈云,町田治彦,田中功,汪禾青,上野惠子,陈克敏,严福华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.10.007
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the feasibility and value of low iodine load at abdominal dynamic enhancement using CT with gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) in patients with renal insufficiency.Methods One hundred patients underwent abdominal dynamic enhancement CT (dual phase) were enrolled in this study.Ten patients with 30 ml· min-1· 1.73 m-2≤estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)< 40 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2were administrated the contrast medium (CM) with a dosage of 300 mg/kg and scanned with GSI.Twenty-five patients with 40 ml· min-1 · 1.73 m-2≤eGFR≤50 ml· min-1 · 1.73 m-2 were administrated the CM with a dosage of 450 mg/kg and scanned with GSI.Sixty-five patients with eGFR> 50 ml · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 were administrated the CM with a standard dosage of 600 mg/kg.Among them 19 patients were scanned with GSI and 46 patients were scanned with conventional protocol (120 kVp).ROIs were manually placed in abdominal aorta,pancreas,liver,spleen and sacrospinalis muscle (as background).The CT value of pre-contrast and post-contrast were calculated for each region.For abdominal aorta and pancreas,CT values of plain scan and late arterial phase(40 s) were measured.For hepatic and splenic parenchyma,CT values of plain scan and hepatic parenchymal phase (100 s) were measured.The keV of monochromatic image of different CM dosage GSI groups with equivalent CT value were calculated according to the conventional group(120 kVp,600 mg/kg).KeV level of optimal contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) monochromatic image were calculated for each region.The difference of CT value and CNR were compared between conventional group and GSI groups.Two sample independent t test was employed and P<0.05 was significant.Results In 300 mg/kg group,53 keV in 40 s[abdominal aorta (314±70) HU,CNR 20.0±5.6;pancreas(85±1 1) HU,CNR 4.0±0.8] and 54 to 57 keV in 100 s[liver (43±6) HU,CNR 3.0±0.9; spleen (68± 8) HU,CNR 3.8± 1.6] had equivalent CT value with conventional group[abdominal aorta (285±60) HU,CNR (19.7±5.0); pancreas (86± 15) HU,CNR 5.1± 1.4; liver (50± 11)HU,CNR 3.3±0.8; spleen (66± 11) HU,CNR 3.5±1.0] and no significant difference of the CNR was found between the two groups(P>0.05).In 450 mg/kg group,63 to 65 keV had equivalent CT value compared with conventional group and higher CNR[abdominal aorta (29.1 ±7.4) vs.(19.7±5.0),pancreas (6.2±2.3) vs.(5.1 ± 1.4),liver (4.3± 1.3) vs.(3.3±0.8),spleen (4.7± 1.7) vs.(3.5± 1.0) than conventional group(all P<0.05).In 600 mg/kg group,72 to 73 keV had equivalent CT value compared with conventional group and higher CNR than conventional group (all P<0.05).Optimal monochromatic images of 450 mg/kg group (40 s) and 600 mg/kg GSI group had higher CT value and CNR than conventional group(all P<0.05).Conclusions Iodine load can be reduced to 50% for the patients with renal insufficiency in abdominal dynamic CT with GSI.GSI with 75% dosage of CM can provide equivalent enhancement quality and higher CNR in abdominal dynamic enhancement CT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?