Wakefulness-Promoting Effects of Lateral Hypothalamic Area–Deep Brain Stimulation in Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Comatose Rats: Upregulation of Α1-Adrenoceptor Subtypes and Downregulation of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Β Receptor Expression Via the Orexins Pathway
Xiaoyang Dong,Wen Ye,Yunliang Tang,Jun Wang,Linyang Zhong,Jing Xiong,Haiping Liu,Guohui Lu,Zhen Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.089
IF: 2.21
2021-01-01
World Neurosurgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that deep brain stimulation (DBS) can improve the level of consciousness of comatose patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). However, the most suitable targets for DBS are unknown, and the mechanisms underlying recovery remain to be determined. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of lateral hypothalamic area-DBS (LHA-DBS) in comatose rats with TBIs. METHODS: A total of 55 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups: the control group, TBI group, stimulated (TBI+LHA-DBS) group, antagonist (TBI+SB334867+LHA-DBS) group, and antagonist control (TBI+saline+LHA-DBS) group. The rats in the control group had undergone a sham operation and anesthesia, without coma induction. Coma was induced using a free fall drop method. The rats in the stimulated group received bilateral LHA stimulation (frequency, 200 Hz; voltage, 2-4 V; pulse width, 0.1 ms) for 1 hour, with 5 minute intervals between subsequent stimulations, which were applied alternately to the left and right sides of the lateral hypothalamus. The comatose rats in the antagonist group received an intracerebroventricular injection with an orexins receptor type 1 (OX1R) antagonist (SB334867) and then received LHA-DBS. A I -VI consciousness scale and electroencephalography were used to assess the level of consciousness in each group of rats after LHA-DBS. Western blotting and immunofluorescence were used to detect OX1R expression in the LHA and alpha 1-adrenoceptor (alpha 1-AR) subtype and gamma-aminobutyric acid b receptor (GABABR) expression in the prefrontal cortex. RESULTS: In the TBI, stimulated, antagonist, and antagonist control groups, 5, 10, 6, and 9 rats were awakened. The electroencephalographic readings indicated that the proportion of d waves was lower in the stimulated group than in the TBI and antagonist groups (P < 0.05). Western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis showed that OX1R expression was greater in the stimulated group than in the TBI group (P < 0.05). The expression of alpha 1-AR was also greater in the stimulated group than in the TBI and antagonist groups (P < 0.05). In contrast, the GABABR levels in the stimulated group were lower than those in the TBI and antagonist groups (P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the antagonist and antagonist control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that LHA-DBS promotes the recovery of consciousness in comatose rats with TBIs. Upregulation of alpha 1-AR expression and downregulation of GABABR expression in the prefrontal cortex via the orexins and OX1R pathways might be involved in the wakefulness-promoting effects of LHA-DBS.