Comparision of two different surgical methods for pediatric traumatic cataract

Yiqiao Xing,Lin Zhou,Tuo Li,Yin Li,Qingsong Wu,Maoju Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2014.11.001
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 20-gague (20-G) and 25-gague (25-G) vitrectomy instruments on the posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy in pediatric traumatic cataract surgery.Methods A retrospective study.81 eyes of 81 children with traumatic cataract were collected in this study.After the phacoemulsification surgery,posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy with 20-G vitrectomy instruments or 25-G vitrectomy instruments were performed.The time of follow-up was 12 ~ 24 months.Postoperative visual acuity,intra-and post-operative complications were observed.Results There were no statistically significant difference between two groups in the best corrected visual acuity before (x2 =0.131,P>0.05) and after (x2 =0.246,P >0.05) surgery.During the surgery,the implantation of intraocular lens in the sulcus was performed in 5 children in 20-G group,but none in 25-G group.The probabilities of retinal edema,after-cataract,the shifting of intraocular lens in 20-G group were much higher than that in 25-G group.Conclusion Compared to 20-G vitrectomy instrument,it is safer and more effective to use 25-G vitrectomy instruments to perform the posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy for pediatric traumatic cataract.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?