A cost-effectiveness analysis of valproate and levetiracetam treatment in Chinese children with newly diagnosed epilepsy

高静云,王颖慧,杨莉,臧莉莉,黄琼辉,赵海娟,王云秀,王丽,姜玉武
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2013.01.013
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) for the first choice in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy,and to understand the pharmacoeconomics choice for anti-epileptic drugs in individual patient.Methods The differences were observed during 6 months treatment process in Chinese children with newly diagnosed epilepsy treated with VPA as the first line drug or LEV as the first line drug by decision tree model.The curative efficacy was evaluated for the first time at the end of 3 months in patients treated with LEV or VPA as monotherapy,and then the treatment strategy was adjusted according to the efficacy evaluation and adverse effects (the first drug continued,added or replaced with VPA or LEV).The second curative efficacy was evaluated after another 3 months of treatment.The effect and cost of 2 kinds of treatment strategies were compared by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER),that was,the additional cost of pay for one more seizure-free case was compared between a kind of treatment and another treatment.Results For a Chinese child with median weight,additional 4981.858 Yuan(RMB) was needed for the increase of each seizure-free case treated with LEV as the first line treatment drug compared with VPA as the first line treatment drug within 6 months.If patients were to pay 4000 Yuan within 6 months treatment,the cost-effectiveness of LEV as the first line treatment was probably better than that of VPA.If patients were to pay 25 000 Yuan within 6 months treatment,there could be 90% possibility of the former cost-effectiveness with LEV as the first line treatment.Conclusions If patients are unlikely to pay more,VPA as the first line treatment is better in cost-effectiveness than that of LEV.If patients are willing to pay,LEV as first line treatment drug is better in cost-effec-tiveness.Pharmacoeconomics factors,as well as other factors,should be considered in guiding the drug choice by the individual patient.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?