Clinical factors influencing the efficacy of lung recruitment maneuver with high-level PEEP in patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome

Xiaowei Liu,Yan Jin,Zhi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2014.09.014
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical factors dominant in the efficacy of lung recruitment maneuver (RM) with high-level positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) under pressure control ventilation in patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by analyzing the clinical data of 24 patients treated with mechanical ventilation.Methods A retrospective study was carried out in a 16-bed capacity emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from October 2009 to January 2010.Twenty-four patients with influenza-associated ARDS were included.During pressure control ventilation,when SpO2 persisted lower than 88% for more than 30 min,RM with high-level PEEP was initiated to normalize lung volume at 30 cmH2O for 60 s.The RM was responded as SpO2 increased more than 3% within 15 min; otherwise,the increase below 3% in SpO2 would be considered non-responded.Variations in respiratory mechanics,oxygen metabolism and hemodynamic parameters were measured before and after RM.Results Of 24 patients with influenza-associated ARDS,16 survived and 8 deceased.The median duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) in EICU was 5.5 days (range from 3.5 to 12.0 days).During the entire study period,a total of 158 RMs with high-level PEEP were done,including 76 (48.1%) responded RMs (the responded group) and 82 (51.9%) non-responded RMs (the non-responded group).In survivor group,the ratio of effective RM was higher than in nonsurvivors group (66.2% vs.33.3%,P < 0.01).Compared with the data before RM,HR was increased (92.6 ± 11.8) vs.(73.0 ± 12.6),P =0.038 and MAP was decreased (66.1 ±9.3) mmHg vs.(73.9 ± 11.4) mmHg,P=0.049 during RM,and these difference were not statistically significant at 3 min after RM.The decrease in SpO2 after 134 procedures of RMs in 85.9% patients,and the minimum value of SpO2 occurred at (2.1 ±0.6) min after RM.In the responded group,the maximum SpO2 were higher than that before RM by (6.9 ± 1.6) % occurred at (12.7 ±2.6) min after RM.Compared with the data before RM,SpO2 were increased (90.4 ± 4.4) % vs.(86.7 ± 7.6) %,P =0.047) in responded group at 30 min after RM.The initial PEEP level in the responded group was lower than that of the non-responded group (8.6 ± 3.4) cmH2O vs.(11.3 ±4.2) cmH2O,P=0.028.The initial mean DMV in the responded group was also shorter than that in the non-responded group (4.1 ± 3.1) d vs.(5.8 ± 2.5) d,P =0.011.Furthermore,the initial dynamic lung-thorax compliance (Cdyn) was obviously higher in the responded group than that in the non-responded group (30.8 ±6.2) mL/cmH2O vs.(26.1 ±5.1) mL/cmH2O,P=0.038.Conclusion The lung RM with high-level PEEP may cause temporary hemodynamic changes and the initial PEEP level,DMV,and Cdyn may be potential factors influencing the efficacy of lung RM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?