A Comparative Study of Two Skin Care Regimens for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis

Song Juan,Jiang Qixia,Wang Xuemei,Hou Jianhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.01.005
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effects of two skin care regimens for incontinence-associated dermatitis. Methods A total of 53 patients with incontinence-associated dermatitis between March and September 2014 were randomly divided into two groups using random number table. Besides consistent skin care methods, group A was additionally treated with silicone coating dressing and group B was treated with skin protective liquid dressing at perineal skin area every 8 hours after cleaning. The effects of nursing care on healing rate and healing time of incontinence-associated dermatitis within 7 days of two groups were compared. Results The healing rate of group A was higher than that of group B (85. 71% vs 61. 54%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2 =5. 352,P<0. 05). The healing time of group A was shorter than that of group B[(5.33 ±2.019)d vs (6.92 ±2.544)d]. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t= -2. 525,P<0. 05). The medical cost of group A was lower than that of group B[(480. 00 ± 181. 723) vs (623. 08 ± 228. 994)], the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t= -2. 525, P<0. 05). Conclusions The effect of silicone coating dressing for the treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis is superior to the skin protective liquid dressing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?