Abstract:Background: To evaluate the prognostic value of the proposed 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients without cervical lymph node metastasis in comparison with the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 382 newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC patients without cervical Lymph node metastasis who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). All received elective neck irradiation to levels II, III, VA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate the prognostic values between adjacent stage categories of the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition and the proposed 8th edition, including overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease–free survival (DFS). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell’s concordance index (c-index) were applied to compare the two prognostic systems with different numbers of stages. Results: The median follow-up time was 61.1 months, with a range from 1 months to 91 months. The 5-year OS, LRFS, RFFS, DMFS and DFS were 86.9%, 96.7%, 99.1%, 93.3% and 82.6%, respectively. For LRFS and DMFS, the proposed eighth editions had superior prognostic value to the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition (P = 0.032 vs. P = 0.086 and P = 0.013 vs. P = 0.112). The 5-year OS and DFS were found to be significant both by the seventh and the proposed 8th editions. The difference between T1 and T3, T1 and T4, T2 and T3 and T2 and T4 by the proposed eighth edition were found to be significant (P = 0.042, P = 0.041, P = 0.000, and P = 0.000), however, there was no significant difference between T1 and T3, T2 and T3 by the seventh edition (P = 0.204, and P = 0.215). In addition, the difference between T1, T2, T3 with T4 were found to be significant in DFS (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.037) and there was no significant difference between T1 and T3 (P = 0.162) by the seventh edition and there was significantly different between T2 and T4 (P = 0.026) by the proposed 8th editions. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, T stage of the proposed 8th editions and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS, LRFS, DMFS and DFS. The AIC value was smaller for the 8th edition compared to the 7th edition staging system. The C-index value was larger for the 8th edition compared to the 7th edition staging system. Conclusions: IMRT with elective neck irradiation provides excellent local-regional control for NPC patients without cervical lymph node metastasis. The proposed eighth editions had superior prognostic value to the AJCC/ UICC 7th edition for LRFS and DMFS and lead a better distinction between adjacent T stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients for OS and DFS. Overall, the proposed 8th UICC T classification seems to be superior to the 7th UICC T classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients without cervical lymph node metastasis. Legal entity responsible for the study: Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

Evaluation of Significance of the 7th Edition of the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Validation of the 7th Edition AJCC Staging System.

The Different Impact of 7th Ed AJCC Cancer Staging System on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Conventional Radiotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era

Evaluation of 7th Edition of Ajcc Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparison Between the 7th and the Proposed 8th Editions of the UICC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Without Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis

A Comparison Between the Chinese 2008 and the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Comparison of the Chinese 2008 and the 7th Edition Ajcc Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Validation of the 8th Edition of the UICC/AJCC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Non-Endemic Areas in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on the 8th Edition of the AJCC/UICC Staging System

Validation and Suggestion of Eighth T Classifications of the UICC/AJCC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: a Retrospective Analysis

Proposal for the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Suggestions for lymph node classification of UICC/AJCC staging system: a retrospective study based on 1197 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Comparative study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system between the chinese 2008 and'92 Fuzhou

The Comparative Analysis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma among Chinese 1992, 2008 and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 2010 Staging Systems

Dosimetric Evaluation of Hippocampus Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Patients with Stage T1-T2 and Stage T3-T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The Prognostic Value of Paranasal Sinus Involvement Based on MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Effect analysis of 847 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases treated with intensity modulated radiation: Experience and suggestions

Value of Cranial Nerve Involvement Found on MRI in Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Validation Of Stagen3of The Eighth Editionajccstaging System For Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma