Nutrition Support Therapy During Critical Illness
Jayshil Patel,Ryan T. Hurt,Manpreet Mundi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94424-1_13
2018-11-09
Abstract:Triggers leading to critical illness, including sepsis, respiratory failure, trauma, and burns, stimulate the metabolic response to stress. This response often leads to uncontrolled catabolism, which may culminate in a calorie deficit, proteolysis (and negative nitrogen balance), and anabolic resistance. Nutrition support was historically viewed as a means to reduce the calorie deficit and restore nitrogen balance. Today, nutrition, particularly enteral nutrition (EN), is viewed as a form of support therapy, a proactive means to preserve gut integrity, modulate inflammation, and maintain gut immunity. Unfortunately, the optimal dose and timing of nutrition support therapy is unknown. Some experts advocate for early and aggressive nutrition, while others maintain a “less is more” stance during the first week of critical illness. Since no two critically ill patients are alike, identifying which patients will benefit from early (and perhaps aggressive) nutrition support therapy is key. Validated scoring systems have emerged to guide the clinician in determining nutritional risk, or the risk of complications in critically ill adult patients who receive little to no nutrition. EN, for its non-nutritional benefits, is still preferred over parenteral nutrition (PN). PN is emerging as a safe and feasible alternative when EN is contraindicated or not tolerated. Since critical care survivors are often debilitated due to acquired loss of muscle mass, emerging observational data suggests protein may be the optimal macronutrient to target, irrespective of overall calorie goal. Clinicians should be aware of patient-, provider-, and institutional process-related barriers that may limit access to or impair nutrition delivery.