Classification Systems of Endometrial Cancer: A Comparative Study about Old and New
Camelia Alexandra Coada,Giulia Dondi,Gloria Ravegnini,Antonio De Leo,Donatella Santini,Eugenia De Crescenzo,Marco Tesei,Alessandro Bovicelli,Susanna Giunchi,Ada Dormi,Marco Di Stanislao,Alessio G Morganti,Dario De Biase,Pierandrea De Iaco,Anna Myriam Perrone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010033
2021-12-24
Abstract:Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy of the female reproductive organs. Historically it was divided into type I and type II, until 2013 when the Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification was proposed. Here, we applied the different classification types on our endometrial cancer patient cohort in order to identify the most predictive one. We enrolled 117 endometrial cancer patients available for the study and collected the following parameters: age, body mass index, stage, menopause, Lynch syndrome status, parity, hypertension, type of localization of the lesion at hysteroscopy, type of surgery and complications, and presence of metachronous or synchronous tumors. The tumors were classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology, Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer, Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma, and Cancer Genome Atlas classification schemes. Our data confirmed that European Society for Medical Oncology risk was the strongest predictor of prognosis in our cohort. The parameters correlated with poor prognosis were the histotype, FIGO stage, and grade. Our study cohort shows that risk stratification should be based on the integration of histologic, clinical, and molecular parameters.