Finding the specific markers of high and low grade gliomas with cDNA, Oiigo microarray with meta-analysis

Zhi-qiang YAO,Yi-cheng LU,Guo-han HU,Ju-xiang CHEN,Chun LUO,Mei-qing LOU,Yao LI,Zhao-rong MA,Qing WEI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-2346.2008.12.013
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To select the differentially expressed genes between high and low grade gliomas to use as a target of diagnosis and treatment, and analyze the result of different samples by two kinds of microarray on different platforms using meta-analysis. Methods eDNA microarray was used to construct 33 sets of glioma gene expression profiles. Oligo microarray was used to construct 17 sets of glioma gene expression profiles. Fisher criterion, support vector machine (SVM) and Bayesian Compound Covariate were used to analyze the mined gene data to distinguish and test the high and low grade gliomas. Meta-analysis was used to analyze the results of two different microarrays. Results 148 marker genes ( 1.06% ) with eDNA profile were found. It was found out that 46 marker genes of high and low grade by the significant level of 0. 01, with predictive sensibility, above 85%. By using meta-analysis to analyze profile of two microarrays, a set of significantly differentially expressed genes in gliomas in the two kinds of microarrays were found. The function of some marker genes were not clear so far, so it's worth researching deeply in these specific markers of high grade gliomas. Conclusion There is different gene expression between different grades of gliomas. Different kinds of microarray from different samples are not identical, and meta-analysis can improve the repeatability and reliability of mieroarray data.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?