Application of Small Current Perioperative Stimulation Threshold in Evaluation of Facial Nerve Function Post Acoustic Neuroma Surgery(report of 96 Cases)

Wang Hai,Huang Xiang,Xu Jian,Xu Ming,Chen Danqi,Chen Mingyu,Zhong Ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2019.05.003
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the predictive value of small current stimulation threshold for the facial nerve outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery.Methods Ninety-six acoustic neuroma patients underwent tumor resection by a single team at Department of Neurosurgery,Huashan Hospital,Fudan University from January 2013 to April 2015 and were enrolled into a prospective cohort study.We defined the minimal stimulation intensity of facial nerve proximal to the brainstem to induce action potential after tumor total resection as stimulation threshold (ST) and a ST of ≤ 0.05 mA as small current.Facial nerve function was evaluated using House-Brackmann (H-B) scale preoperatively and postoperatively (1,3,6,12 months).By means of binary,ordinal and linear regression analysis,the facial nerve function outcomes in the small current and control (> 0.05 mA) groups were compared.The sensitivity and specificity of the small current prediction facial nerve function were calculated by the four-grid method.Results The ST in all 96 cases was 0.01-0.35 mA with an average of 0.06 ± 0.02 mA.Seventy-four patients were included in the small current group and 22 in the control group.While adjusting for the following covariates:ages,tumor size,tumor location,tumor texture,Samii scale and preoperative H-B scale,binary logistic regression analysis showed that the rate of good facial nerve outcome (H-B score of Ⅰ-Ⅱ) in small cunrent group was significantly better than that in control group [43.2% (32/74) vs.4.5% (1/22) at 1 month;62.2% (46/74) vs.31.8% (7/22) at 3 months;70.3% (52/74) vs.40.9% (9/22) at 6 months;81.1% (60/74)vs.45.5% (10/22) at 12 months;all P < 0.05].Ordinal regression analysis revealed that compared with the control group the facial nerve outcome in small current group shifted toward a better condition at 1,3,6,and 12 months postoperatively.A faster recovery rate was found in small current group among patients with H-B score of Ⅳ at 1 month postoperatively (slope:-0.163 vs.-0.057,P =0.004).The sensitivity and specificity of small current for predicting facial nerve function 1 year after surgery were 85.7% and 46.2%,respectively.Conclusions Small current seems to be a better short-term and long-term predictor of postoperative facial nerve function.For patients with H-B Ⅳ at 1 month post operation,small current could predict faster recovery rate of facial nerve function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?