Expressions of EphA2 and EphrinA1 are associated with malignant phenotype of gliomas

Xia LI,Li WANG,Bing LI,Wei LIN,Li ZHANG,Hai-ning ZHEN,Shi-jie HU,Xiang ZHANG,Zhou FEI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-8925.2011.03.001
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the relation between altered expressions of EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand EphrinA1 and malignant phenotype of glioma cells, and explore the new targeting molecule for treating malignant gliomas. Methods The RNAi vector (plasmid pSilencer-EphA2-SR) against EphA2 was constructed and transfected into the malignant glioma cells (U251, U87 and SHG44). Forty-eight h after the transfection, the expressions of EphA2 and EphrinA1 were detected by Western blotting; the viability and anchorage independence of the glioma cells were observed by MTT assay and colony formation assay; the invasion viability and apoptosis of glioma cells were observed by modified Boyden chamber assay and flow cytometry. Glioma xenograft models were established in nude mice; plasmid pSilencer-EphA2-SR or pSilencer-null mixed with lipofectamine was intratumorally injected. The average tumor volume and weight of the transplanted gliomas were measured and compared; the expressions of EphA2 and EphrinA1 were detected by immunohistochemical staining.Results The RNAi plasmid against EphA2 was successfully constructed. After the transfection of plasmid pSilencer-EphA2-SR, the expression of endogenous EphA2 was suppressed, which consequently resulted in increased EphrinA1 level. As compared with cells of the plasmid pSilencer-null group, cells of the plasmid pSilencer-EphA2-SR group showed obviously decreased cell viability, anchorage independence rate and in vitro invasion ability, but significantly increased cell apoptosis rate (P<0.05).Furthermore, suppression of EphA2 resulted in delayed tumor growth and increased EphrinA 1 expression in mice xenografts. Conclusion EphA2 and EphrinA1 may be key coupled-regulators for malignant phenotype of glioma cells. EphA2 suppression partially reverses the malignant phenotype of aggressive gliomas, possibly through up-regulating the EphrinA1 expression, which indicates that EphA2 and EphrinA1 might become the new targeting molecule for treatment of gliomas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?