Long-term Effect of LASEK for the Treatment of Low to Moderate Myopia with Thin Cornea

ZHANG Xiao-feng,LI Long-biao,DING Jie,SHEN Bo-yuan,MA Xiao-ling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2011.11.008
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the long term effect and safety of laser subepithelial keratomileusis( LASEK)for the treatment of low to moderate myopia with thin cornea( central corneal thickness < 500 μm) Methods To analyze patients with low to moderate myopia in 5 -7 years after LASEK,and compare the refraction,visual acuity,contrast sensitivity,glare contrast sensitivity,corneal endothelium and corneal topography between pateints with thin cornea and normal thickness cornea.Results Thin cornea group had 27 cases (52 eyes).Normal thickness cornea group had 31 cases (62 eyes).No keratoconus had been observed during the follow-up period in the two groups.The corrected visual acuity of both groups were ≥1.0 ;In the thin cornea group,49 eyes' uncorrected visued acuity were ≥ 1.0,and 3 eyes were < 1.0.In the normal cornea group,58 eyes' uncorreeted visued acuity were ≥ 1.0,and 4 eyes were < 1.0 (x2 = 0.0228,P > 0.05).In the thin cornea group,49 eyes had 0 degree of cornea Haze,and 3 eyes had 0.5 degrees of cornea Haze.On the other hand,in the normal thickness cornea group,60 eyes had 0 degree of cornea Haze,and 2 eyes had 0.5 degrees of cornea Haze(x2 =0.4416,P > 0.05 ).The shapes of the corneal endothelium of bothgroups were quite consistent and appear to be hexagonal,and the cell edge was neat.The average endothelial cell density:(2330±294)/mm2 in the thin cornea group,and (2413 ±320)/mm2 in the normal corneal thickness group; The average endothelial cell area:(420 ± 78 )μm2 in the thin cornea group,and (447 ± 92 ) μm2 ( t =1.6875,P > 0.05 ) in the normal thickness cornea group.The contrast sensitivity of two groups with or without glare condition had significant difference for every spatial frequencies (P > 0.05 ).Conclusion LASEK for the treatment of low to moderate myopia with thin cornea is tested to be safe,stable and with no keratoconus.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?