Functional magnetic resonace imaging in patients with optic neuritis.
Xuzhong Shen,Chenghua Tao,Li Sun,Zhaoceng Lu,Wen Ye,Weijun Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132267
IF: 6.133
2014-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:Optic neuritis (ON), an acute inflammatory optic neuropathy, causes conduction blocks in the optic nerve and a series of visual functional changes. It is characterized not only by the inflammation of the optic nerve but also the visual dysfunction caused by the neuropathy involving optic chiasm, lateral geniculate body, optic radiation, and visual cortex. Clinical diagnosis mainly relies on the visual function evaluation using electrophysiology, vision examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, pattern-visual evoked potential (P-VEP) and visual field examination have limitation. Blood-oxygenation level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI), an integrative modality of the function, images and anatomy, can be used to monitor the status of brain activity in the functional areas in vivo. The present study aimed to examine the status of functional activities of the visual cortex in the patients with optic neuritis using of BOLD-fMRI technique and to evaluate the application of fMRI in the optic neuritis. METHODS Patiens A retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology, Huashan Hospital (Shanghai, China). This study collected 11 consecutive patients (17 eyes) diagnosed with ON from March 2008 to March 2009 with nine females (81.82%; mean age, (33.7±11.8) years) and two males (aged 53 and 57 years, respectively). The diagnosis of ON was primarily made based on the criteria as proposed in Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT).1 Routine eye examinations Patients were examined and assessed by visual acuity test (International Standard “E” Eye Chart) and fundus. Central visual field With tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) strategy, automated perimetry was performed using computer-assisted Octopus101 operated with the program 32. The observation included the morphology of visual field defects and the mean defect (MD) of the central 15-degree visual field. MD is the mean difference of light sensitivity between the patient's vision and the expected normal vision (the same age). It serves as an index for the decrease in retinal sensitivity and its range matches the affected visual field, denoted by decibels (dB). MD is not much affected by the limited defect of visual field. Briefly, the data collected from comparison chart were statistically analyzed. The results were presented in the chart as “+, (0 dB)” (normal), “Reading” (dB at that point), and “▪, (32 dB)” (the absolute defect at the point). The arithmetic average obtained from 22 points (excluding physiologically blind spot) within central 15° in the comparison chart was defined as a local MD (Figure 1).Figure 1.: Test of a patient, whose left eye was the affected eye. A: The comparison chart established by program 32 in OCTOPUS101 perimetry. B: fMRI results (the activated area of the brain). The positive voxels were the voxels of activation of visual cortex.P-VEP Electro-functional examination was performed using electrophysiological diagnostic system (RETI-port gamma). We recorded P-VEP in response to a black-and-white check board generated on a TV screen of 60′. Parameters used for the test were spatial frequency at 1 cpd; temporal frequency at 8 Hz; stimulating field as 12°×16°; contrast at 87%; stimulation for 250 ms and overlay at 100. Observed indicators include latency of P100-wave and amplitude reduction. fMRI Instruments and visual stimulation fMRI was performed using GE signa VH/i 3.0T scanner (8-channel head coil), and visual stimulation test was conducted with functional magnetic resonance system (SAMRTEC, SA-9800, Shenzhen Virtue Medical Co., Ltd.). Imaging was aquired with the patient positioned supine to the magnet center (the quadrature head coil) and the head fixed in a foam pad. Through a mirror above the head coil, patient received visual stimulation as displayed on the screen for an effective field of vision of about 12 degrees. We used high contrast, drifting black-and-white checkerboards as the visual stimulation, turnover frequency 8 Hz. A block design was used as the visual task, divided into two kinds of state “stimulation” and “control” alternately, each lasting 36 seconds, repeat 3 times. The stimulated subjects were asked to watch the central of checkerboard at the state of “stimulation” and to look at the central fixation point of the screen at the state of “control”. The stimulation lasted for 250 ms for up to 100 times. The visual stimulation was controlled with E-Prime 1.1 sp3 program (Psychology Software Tools Inc., USA), which precisely synchronized MRI scanning transmitted-RF pulse with activation of visual stimulation program. Image acquisition and analysis High resolution images of the brain structure were acquired sagittally with inversion-recovery prepared 3D-SPGR sequence, TR: 6 ms, TE: 1.4 ms, TI: 400 ms, FA: 15, FOV: 24 cm, Matrix: 256×256, thickness of layer: 1 mm. fMRI scanning was conducted using GRE-EPI sequence. The images acquired perpendicularly to the calcarine sulcus, TR: 3000 ms, TE: 35 ms, FA: 90, FOV: 24 cm, Matrix: 64×64, thickness of layer: 3 mm, total acquisition phase number: 72. The images were processed and analysed mainly with SPM5 software (Statistical parametric Mapping, available at http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/), after head moving correction, spatial normalization, spatial smoothing preprocessing, each of the subjects' functional data used hemodynamic function after convolution stimulation mode function as the design matrix, the general linear model to estimate the parameters of the time series images, to obtain statistical parametric mapping of visual stimulation by t test, and <0.001 to uncorrected P value, spatial threshold less than 10 voxel for statistics difference threshold for individual activation map. In the current study, included for fMRI evaluation were the distribution of activated visual cortex in response to visual stimulation; the number of activated voxels, and the average percentage of BOLD signal changes (obtained through the SPM plug-in for Marsbar). Statistical analysis Correlation analysis (Pearson's Correlation) was performed using SPSS 11.0 software (SPSS Inc., USA). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Basic information Of 11 ON patients (17 eyes) collected for this study, 5 patients (45.45%) were unilateral and 6 (54.55%) were bilateral. All were the first onset. The longest course was less than 3 weeks. Vision The results of best-corrected visual acuity obtained in outpatient clinic: nine of the 17 affected eyes were 0.1-0.4, eight were less than 0.1; four of the unaffected eyes were 1.0, one was 0.8. Fundus Of all 17studied eyes, the boundaries of optic nerve head in 7 were found fuzzy (41.18%), but the abnormal cups were not more than 3 diopters in depth. The rest of 10 eyes had clearly defined borders for optic disc. Static perimetry for the central 15-degree visual field Among 17 affected eyes, 2 were found blind, 8 with diffuse defects, and 7 with localized defects including central scotoma, scotoma in three quadrants, and fan-shaped, circular or irregular defects. Visual field abnormalities were found in all (100%), the largest being diffuse defects (47.06%). Five unaffected eyes were normal. P-VEP Among 17 affected eyes, P-VEP could not be recorded in four eyes (23.53%) but could be recorded in the remaining 13 eyes (76.47%). The changes of P-VEP were increased P100-wave latency and reduced P100 amplitude. In contrast, five unaffected eyes were in normal range. fMRI BOLD activation was mainly located in the occipital visual cortex (equivalent to Brodmann17/18 area), concentrating around the calcarine fissure. The cortical activation was largely located in the primary visual cortex. In the activated area, the number of BOLD signal-activated voxels decreased, and the average percentage changes of BOLD signals were low (Figure 1). Correlation analysis was performed in 11 patients. MD of the central 15-degree visual field was found to be negatively correlated with the number of activated voxels (P=0.008, r =-0.622) while no significant difference with the average percentage changes in the BOLD signals. Amplitude of P100-wave and the number of activated voxels were positively correlated (P=0.003, r=0.693). There was no significant difference between P100-wave latency with the number of activated voxels and between amplitude and latency of P100-wave with the average percent BOLD signal changes (Table 1).Table 1: Examine data of affected and unaffected eyesDISCUSSION fMRI, based on changes in BOLD signals associated with functional brain activity, is used for localization of neural activity area. Neurons activity can be observed in a non-invasive way by fMRI, which is characteristic of more accurate positioning, relatively high spatial and temporal resolution and good repeatability and widely used in neuroscience, especially visual neuroscience research. Our data showed that the number of activated voxels decreased in 11 patients (17 eyes). The number of activated voxels in the affected eyes was fewer than that of the unaffected eyes. The average BOLD percentage signal change in the affected eyes also decreased. BOLD signals of the affected eyes were located mainly in the cortex and related to visual field defects. The number of activated voxels were significantly reduced upon stimulation, reflecting a connection between the retina and the visual cortical projection. MD of the central 15-degree visual field were negatively correlated with the number of activated voxels (P=0.008, r=-0.622), but the difference between MD of the central 15-degree visual field and the average BOLD percentage signal change was not significant. Amplitude of P100-wave was positively correlated with the number of activated voxels (P=0.003, r=0.693), but the difference between P100-wave latency and the number of activated voxels was insignificant. The differences between P100 amplitude, latency and the average BOLD percentage signal change were not significant. The possible mechanism underlying this phenomenon could be: (1) Decreased visual acuity led to a reduced afferent nerve activity, so that the excitatory postsynaptic potentials evoked in the neurons between lateral geniculate nucleus and V1's layer 4 (primary visual cortex) continued to decrease. Such changes would alter the number, configuration and function in cortical neurons and their synaptic connections, leading to a lower level of cortical activity and a reduction in the number of the activated voxels. (2) Delayed excitability of optic nerve and unsynchronized signal transduction (diffusion) of ganglion cells reduced synchronization among neurons driven by the affected eye in the visual cortex and synchronous discharge between both eyes, resulting in reduced cortical activation. In our previous fMRI studies of the visual pathway diseases in which we used the same instrument parameters and the same number of normal eyes in the control as used for the present study, we found that the BOLD signal changes in the primary visual cortex were consistent with the defects of the patient's vision and visual function.2 Our study, together with other related studies, also indicated that the response of fMRI and that of VEP were well correlated.3,4 Because nerve conduction velocity or the extent of demyelination in optic neuritis cannot be evaluated by fMRI, VEP is still irreplaceable in the diagnosis of ON.1,5 Therefore, further studies are warranted on how to describe nerve conduction by fMRI. Since the progression of optic neuritis is rapid and the manifestations of ON is complex and associated with the impairment of the central nervous system, the evaluation of visual function relying on vision examination, visual field and electro-physiology obviously has limitations. Compared with traditional visual field examination and VEP, application of fMRI not only raises the patients' awareness of their condition but also has the remarkable advantage of more directly reflecting the status of neural functions as it provides direct observation of the location, range, and intensity of the cortical signal processing. fMRI has higher spatial resolution than VEP, and is able to present each individual voxel of cortical activity. In contrast, VEP is able to detect only the sum total of the cortical activity. In addition, fMRI signal can be superimposed on the conventional MRI scan for positioning. As fMRI can provide valuable clues for diagnose and prognosis of optic neuritis, it is justifiable that more studies are to be expected on the use of fMRI in optic neuritis.