Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Ⅰ-related Chain A Antigens Stimulate Endothelial Cells Proliferation and Cause Changes of Their Secreting Functions

WANG Yun-yan,HOU Jian-quan,HE Jun,YUAN Xiao-ni,ZHANG Jiang-lei,WEN Duan-gai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2010.10.046
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the impact of major histocompatibility complex class Ⅰ -related chain A (MICA) antigen against endothelial cells and changes of secreting functions. Methods The endothelial cells were divided into three experimental groups (A5, A10, A25), which were stimulated with exogenous recombinant MICA antigen at 5, 10 and 25 μg/L respectively. Group A0 was added equivalent volume of PBS as control. The proliferation of endothelial cells was measured by MTF assay. The levels of metabolic product of PGI2 (6-keto-PGF1α), endothelin (ET-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and its inhibitor (PAI) and soluble MICA (sMICA) in the supernatant of all groups were determined. Results A570 values in all experimental groups were higher than in control group. A570 values in both As and A10 groups were significantly higher than in control group and A25 group ( P < 0. 05 ), but there were no significant differences between A5 and A10 groups (P > 0. 05 ). The proliferation rate of 48 h was the highest in identical dosage. A570 of 48 h was 0. 458, 0. 446 and 0. 389 in A5, A10, A25 respectively. The proliferation rate at 72 h and 96 h was persistently decreased over time. There were significant differences (P <0. 05).The level of 6-keto-PGF1α in groups A10, A25 was 144. 6 and 132. 8 ng/L, which was lower than in group A0 (226. 5 ng/L) and A5 (232. 6 ng/L). The level of ET-1 in groups A10, A25 was 23. 6 and 25.8 ng/L,and that in group A0, A5 was 11. 8 and 10. 4 ng/L, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0. 05). The level of t-PA in experimental groups were 161.2, 154. 2 and 157. 8 μg/L, and the level of PAI was 221.6, 248.5 and 252. 4 μg/L, respectively. sMICA in three experimental groups was 35.8,27. 4 and 21.8 ng/L respectively, which was lower than that in control group (352. 5 ng/L). There were significant differences between experimental groups and control group ( P < 0. 05 ). Conclusion The small dosage of MICA antigen can stimulate endothelial cell persistent proliferation. Meanwhile, MICA antigen can cause the injury of endothelial cells and induce the enhanced coagulation function, the declined fibrinolytic function and the decreased level of sMICA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?