Association Between Calcitonin and Efficacy of Anlotinib in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: an Analysis Based on the ALTER01031 Trial.

Ming Gao,Yihebali Chi,Pingzhang Tang,Zhengang Xu,Xiangqian Zheng,Dapeng Li,Xiaohong Chen,Minghua Ge,Yuan Zhang,Zhuming Guo,Jun Wang,Jie Chen,Jiewu Zhang,Ying Cheng,Zhendong Li,Hui Liu,Jianwu Qin,Jingqiang Zhu,Ruochuan Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6526
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:6526 Background: Calcitonin (Ct) is the most important biomarker for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). In a randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial (ALTER01031, NCT02586350) for MTC, anlotinib exhibited a strong capability not only in PFS prolongation but also in decreasing Ct level. This subanalysis explored the relationship between Ct level and anlotinib efficacy in this trial. Methods: Serum Ct of patients (pts) were tested at baseline and on week 6 (after 2 treatment cycles). Correlation between changes in Ct level and changes in target lesion diameters was explored. The influence of baseline Ct level on median PFS for anlotinib treated pts was estimated. Finally, pts in anlotinib arm were divided into two subgroups based on the percentage decline of Ct levels (> 50% vs. ≤50%) at week 6. Median PFS (mPFS), median OS (mOS) and objective response rate (ORR) of two groups were compared. Results: 86 of 91 enrolled pts (58 in anlotinib arm and 28 in placebo arm) were recorded their serum Ct levels at baseline and no significant difference was observed between two arms (7990.0 ng/L vs. 10891.5 ng/L, P = 0.192). After 2 treatment cycles, the Ct level decreased to 4597.5 ng/L in anlotinib arm (n = 50) while increased slightly in placebo arm (12640.0 ng/L, n = 24, P = 0.006). For 49 pts in anlotinib arm who had complete assessments at baseline and week 6, roughly linear relationship was observed between Ct levels (X-axis) and target lesion diameters (Y-axis) in percent changes from baseline to week 6 (y = 0.175x – 0.049; r = 0.352, P = 0.016, excluding 3 outliers). Pts with less baseline Ct level (≤ median value vs. > median value) did not show more PFS benefit (17.7 vs. 22.4 months, P = 0.802). However, after 2 treatment cycles, a trend of better survival and higher response was observed in pts with high percentage decline of Ct level (> 50%, n = 25) than those with low percentage decline (≤50%, n =25) although without statistical difference (data presented in the table below). Conclusions: In ALTER01031, anlotinib showed a strong capability in rapidly decreasing serum Ct. Lower baseline Ct level does not mean better prognosis while a rapid Ct decrease may predict improved survival and treatment response to MTC pts received anlotinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02586350 . [Table: see text]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?