Hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering

Jiayu Kang,Jianwei Lyu,Zhihu Zhao,Jianxiong Ma,Xinlong Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253?2352.2019.22.008
2019-01-01
Abstract:Osteochondral defects caused by various factors are still difficult clinical problems. With the development of tissue engineering, the strategies and methods for repairing osteochondral defects in the past decade have made great progress , and some osteochondral tissue stratified stent products have gradually entered the clinical trial stage.. The related articles on tis?sue engineering for the treatment of osteochondral defects were retrieved by searching databases with key words osteochondral de?fects, cartilage repair and hierarchical scaffolds. This paper discussed the research status of hierarchical scaffolds in osteochondral tissue engineering during recent five years. In this work, the classification of hierarchical scaffold including monophasic scaffolds, bilayered scaffolds, multilayered scaffolds and gradient scaffolds, are summarized by comparing different experiment researches. Furthermore, the advantages and disadvantages of different types of hierarchical scaffolds were introduced through analyzing rele?vant studies. Monophasic scaffolds can support the adhesion and proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes, but lack the inher?ent stratified structure features required for osteochondral regeneration.. Bilayered scaffolds consist of a chondral layer and sub?chondral layer which base on the biocompatibility of monophasic scaffolds. Biphasic scaffolds are significantly better than mono?phasic scaffolds in simulating natural cartilage, but the interface between chondral and subchondral layer is poor binding. Com?pared with bilayered scaffold, trilayered scaffolds are added with an intermediate layer which simulates the calcification of normal cartilage between the two layers, so as to obtain better connection of the bone and cartilage layer. Unlike hierarchical scaffolds, gra?dient scaffolds provide a gradient connection between the layers, which is more similar to the native osteochondral tissue. In the past five years, the development of osteochondral layered scaffolds mainly depended on the novel structure and fabrication meth?ods of scaffolds. However, correlational clinical studies are quite few. Further high quality and large clinical studies are still re?quired.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?