The Analysis and Evaluation of Resident Professionalism

李荣,李亚平,彭杰,黄利辉,曾锋,陈慧玲,钱招昕,雷光华,陈翔
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677x.2016.02.034
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective Objective To evaluate the status of residents professionalism and provide feedback and reference for professionalism education.Methods An adaptation evaluation form and faculty evaluation.Results Residents professionalism overall is in a better scope," respect" get highest score and "responsibility & leadership" get lowest score in seven evaluation elements of professionalism;Only five indicators (total there are 29 indicators) difference was statistically significant between score of self-assessment and teachers evaluation (P < 0.05);The difference of professionalism ratings between different graders was statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusions "Responsibility & Leadership" education of residents should be strengthened.The residents should be educated to help their fellow workers improve inadequate facets,intervene on behalf of patients when others behave unprofessionally,and enhance emotional self-control and role group leader in group-learning.The professionalism education of the faculty and the senior residents should be strengthened.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?