Abstract:Abstract Background Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is an integral part of the treatment for cleft lip and alveolus and cleft lip and palate. However, the outcome of SABG was not satisfactory as expected, factors that affecting the outcome were still controversial. The aims of this study were to summarize a new method for the classification of alveolar cleft morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or unilateral cleft lip and palate, to evaluate the correlation between the morphology and SABG outcomes, to identify factors that might predict the outcomes. Methods The characteristics of the cleft morphologies of 120 patients who underwent SABG were observed using the preoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images. 52 patients who had CBCT scans performed at least 6 months after SABG were included for the evaluation of outcomes. Both categorical and continuous evaluation methods were measured. Correlations between cleft morphology and SABG outcomes were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient in SPSS 27.0.0. Results A new method for the classification of cleft morphology was summarized:type I, prism type (labial defect size ≥ palatal defect size; nasal defect size ≥ occlusal defect size); type II, prism’ type (labial defect ≥ palatal defect; nasal defect < occlusal defect); type III, inverted prism type (palatal defect ≥ labial defect); type IV, funnel type (presented as a significantly narrow defect area in the middle towards the vertical dimension); and type V, undefinable (extremely irregular morphology can’t be defined as any of the above types). Categorical evaluation showed 8 failure, 11 poor, 12 moderate, and 21 good results, while the average bone filling rate was 59.24 ± 30.68%. There was a significant correlation between the cleft morphology and categorical/continuous evaluation outcome (p < 0.05). Conclusion The new method for the classification of alveolar cleft morphology summarized in this study was comprehensive and convenient for clinical application. Both categorical and continuous methods should be used for radiographic assessments in patients undergoing SABG. The chances of a successful procedure might be better when the patient has type I or IV morphology, in which the shape is like a funnel in the relatively palatal or occlusal area towards the vertical dimension. A relatively great amount of bone resorption was observed in most patients. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry; registration number: ChiCTR2100054438.

The outcome of alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolar process only

Analysis of the assessment methods of secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate

Effect of root formation on the cleft canine eruption after secondary alveolar bone grafting

Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Various Types of Cleft

Long-Term Stability of Alveolar Bone Graft in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Correlation Between Alveolar Cleft Morphology and the Outcome of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Optimization of dental status improves long-term outcome after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Influence of alveolar-bone grafting on the nasal profile: unilateral cleft lips, alveoli, and palates.

Osseous Outcomes of Cleft Alveolar Bone Grafting with Allograft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: Preliminary Study with Radiological Outcome

Clinical study on secondary alveolar bone grafting by lip side combined with palate side approach

Bone grafting, corticotomy, and orthodontics: treatment of cleft alveolus in a chinese cohort.

A Longitudinal Study of Facial Growth of Operated Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients before Puberty

Comparative study of nasal profile before and after alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Mandibular bone graft material for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects: long-term results

A investigation of dental arch width in the patients of bilateral cleft lip and palate after operation

Comparing Three-dimensional Radiologic Outcomes Between Early Versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Advancement in the methods for reconstructing alveolar cleft

Difference in the Surgical Outcome of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with and without Pre-Alveolar Bone Graft Orthodontic Treatment

Comparison of Alveolar Bone Grafting Outcomes using CBCT in Individuals with UCLP Based on the Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment Methods

Clinical Outcomes Of Dental Implant Therapy In Alveolar Cleft Patients: A Systematic Review

Treatment of alveolar cleft in patients with cleft lip and palate