Spontaneous versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomized trial
Jun Liu,Hengrui Liang,Fei Cui,Hui Liu,Chengchu Zhu,Wenhua Liang,Jianxing He,Jun Liu,Hengrui Liang,Fei Cui,Wei Wang,Shunjun Jiang,Wenhua Liang,Jianxing He,Hui Liu,Qinglong Dong,Lixia Liang,Hanyu Yang,Yingfen Li,Chengchu Zhu,Jiang Jin,Jianfei Shen,Tianyang Dai,Kaiming He,Kaican Cai,Siyang Feng,Haofei Wang,Zhifeng Zhang,Haoda Huang,Chao Cheng,Zhenguo Liu,Kun Qiao,Zhaohua Xia,Xiang Liu,Guangsuo Wang,Tonghai Huang,Shun Xu,Qiming Shen,Wenfei Tan,Jinfeng Ding,Yulin Liu,Jing Ye,Jiang Yu,Huangkai Zhang,Xia Feng,Mingfei Ma,Zhongxin Duan,Yali Li,Hong Ma,Calvin S.H. Ng,Diego González-Rivas,Eugenio Pompeo,Erlin Daley,Raja M. Flores,Yaron Shargall,Mahmoud Ismail,Keng-Leong Ang,Vincenzo Ambrogi,Ahmed Elkhouly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.093
2022-05-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery (SV-VATS) is reported to have superior or equal efficacy on postoperative recovery to mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS). However, perioperative safety of the SV-VATS blebectomy is not entirely demonstrated.METHODS: We performed a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial (No. NCT03016858) for primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients aged 16 to 50 years undergoing a SV-VATS and the MV-VATS procedure. The trial was conducted at 10 centers in China from April 2017 to January 2019. The primary outcome was the comparison of intra- and postoperative complications between SV-VATS and MV-VATS procedures. Secondary outcomes included total analgesia dose, change of vital sign during surgery, procedural duration, recovery time, postoperative visual analog pain scores, and hospitalization length.RESULTS: In this study, 335 patients were included. There was no significant difference between the SV-VATS group and the MV-VATS group in the intra- and postoperative complication rates (17.90% vs 22.09%; relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.26; P = .346). The SV-VATS group was associated with significantly decreased total dose of intraoperative opioid agents; that is, sufentanil (11.37 μg vs 20.92 μg; P < .001) and remifentanil (269.78 μg vs 404.96 μg; P < .001). The SV-VATS procedure was also associated with shorter extubation time (12.28 minutes vs 17.30 minutes; P < .001), postanesthesia care unit recovery time (25.43 minutes vs 30.67 minutes; P = .02) and food intake time (346.07 minute vs 404.02 minutes; P = .002). Moreover, the SV-VATS procedure deceased the anesthesia cost compared with the MV-VATS ($297.81 vs $399.81; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: SV-VATS was shown to be noninferior to MV-VATS in term of complication rate and in selected patients undergoing blebectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system