Abstract:Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) with side fenestration on the needle was developed aiming to obtain both cytological aspirates and histological core samples. To reveal the diagnostic yield of FNB sampling solid mass compared to standard fine needle aspiration (FNA), we conducted a large-scale multicenter study in patients with pancreatic and non-pancreatic masses. We also aimed to establish optimal techniques in EUS tissue acquisition. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter single-blind randomized controlled trial. Between December 2014 and January 2016, 408 patients were enrolled from five tertiary-care academic medical centers and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either 22G FNA or 22G FNB. Two tissue acquisition (TA) techniques (1st and 2nd passes using slow pull vs. 3rd and 4th passes using suction methods) were performed on all EUS needles. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield comparing FNA and FNB on all solid lesions, pancreatic and non-pancreatic masses, respectively. Secondary endpoints were the quality of the histologic specimen (quantity of cell, tissue integrity, and blood contamination). Results: Among all lesion, FNB group (n=190) compared to FNA group (n=187) gained superior histological diagnostic yield (91.44% vs. 80%; p = 0.0015), and higher cytological diagnostic yield (85.56% vs. 78.95%; p = 0.093). For pancreatic mass, FNB group (n=123) achieved better histological diagnostic yield compared to FNA group (n=126) (92.68% vs. 81.75%; p = 0.0099), and also higher cytological diagnostic yield (88.62% vs. 79.37%; p = 0.00468), respectively. For non-pancreatic mass, there was no difference between FNB and FNA on diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore for pancreatic mass, when slow pull technique was applied in the first and second passes, FNB was superior to FNA on specimen quality and diagnostic yield. Conclusion: FNB needle achieved superior overall diagnostic yield compared to FNA needle among all studied solid lesions. For pancreatic masses, the 22G FNB needle also gained superior histological diagnostic accuracy and higher cytological diagnostic yield compared to 22G FNA. We further suggest choosing FNB over FNA on pancreatic lesion for TA when slow pull technique was applied in the first two passes.Table: Table. Technical characteristics and outcomes of EUS-FNA/FNB

A Multi-Center Study of Wet Suction Technique under Endoscopic Ultrasound for Solid Lesions

The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Different Needle Types for Solid Pancreatic Masses: a Prospective and Randomized Comparative Trial in Two Centers

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses

Comparation of 5 ml and 10 ml Negative Pressures with Wet-suction Techniques for EUS-FNA of Solid Lesions

Comparison of Specimen Quality among the Standard Suction, Slow-Pull, and Wet Suction Techniques for EUS-FNA: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions

Optimal Sampling Technique for EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using a 25-Gauge ProCore Needle: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Superiority Study

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Gastrointestinal Lesions with Inconclusive Endoscopic Biopsies

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Endoscopy-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Peritoneal Lesions.

Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Occupying Lesions in Upper Digestive Tract and Peripheral Areas

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

Comparison of Smear Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in EUS-guided FNA of Pancreatic Lesions: Experience from a Large Tertiary Center

Influence of different sample processing methods on yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Single-Center Analysis

Value of on-site cytopathology evaluation by trained endoscopists during endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions

Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Small (≤20 Mm) Pancreatic Lesions

Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Fine‐Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

Transrectal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for qualitative diagnosis of pelvic space-occupying lesions: a diagnostic test