Residual kyphosis after total vertebral osteotomy for severe kyphoscoliosis:its risk factors and treatment

邱勇,朱泽章,王斌,俞杨,钱邦平,朱锋,马薇薇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2352.2008.01.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the risk factors of residual kyphosis after total vertebral osteotomy for severe kyphoscoliosis,and to present further surgical strategy.Methods From April 2002 to January 2006,75 patients with severe kyphoscoliosis deformity were treated with posterior total vertebral osteotomy.The pre-operative scoliosis Cobb angle was 72°(51°-130°)and kyphosis Cobb angle was 82°(69°-147°).There were 7 patients with neurological deficits pre-operatively.All the patients received primary posterior total vertebral osteotomy and instrumentation.28 out of 75 patients underwent secondary anterior strut grafting on the concave side(group A)or anterior interbody autografling on the convex side(group B)according to the residual kyphosis after posterior operation.Results There were 11 cases in group A and 17 cases in group B.The risk factors of the residual kyphosis after posterior total vertebral osteotomy were as follows:hyperkyphosis(>100°)in 11 patients,continuous convex hemivertebrae in 5,hemivertebrae combined with failure of vertebral body segmentation in 4.insufficient osteotomy on the concave side in 3.insufficient rib head resection in 2,and partial correction to avoid spinal cord compression in 3.22 patients were followed up for an average period of 21 months.No death and infection occurred.In group A,one patient developed pseudarthrosis and rod failure due to the tibial strut fracture,one patient diagnosed as suspicious pseudarthrosis,and other patients achieved bony fusion.One patient suffered from tibia fracture in donor area due to trauma.Patients in group B achieved bony fusion and no implant failure was found.Conclusion For the patients with residual kyphosis after total vertebral osteotomy,additional anterior strut grafting on the concave side or anterior interbody autografting on the convex side could reduce the implant failure,correction loss and neurological complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?